glassjester
Well-known member
Yes. At least the pro-life stance is logically consistent.
To be pro-choice, you have to be willing to maintain some major cognitive dissonance.
Abortion Exceptions (Written pre election)
- Thread starter Husband&Father
- Start date
Yes. At least the pro-life stance is logically consistent.
To be pro-choice, you have to be willing to maintain some major cognitive dissonance.
Husband&Father
New member
You talk of “life saving abortion” as if it is a real thing yet can’t name a single condition where a surgical or chemical abortion is the remedy?
Pregnancy is not a disease and abortion is not a cure for anything.
The “life of the mother” canard is a false flag. It’s never OK to kill an innocent mother even if her baby’s life is in danger. By-the-same-token it’s never OK to kill an innocent baby even if the mother is sick.
Pregnancy is not a disease and abortion is not a cure for anything.
The “life of the mother” canard is a false flag. It’s never OK to kill an innocent mother even if her baby’s life is in danger. By-the-same-token it’s never OK to kill an innocent baby even if the mother is sick.
Husband&Father
New member
When would it be safer or more beneficial to abort the baby rather than deliver it? I want to be better informed. Can you tell me some complications or conditions where preforming an abortion helps more than staging a delivery? (assuming the pregnancy MUST end or the mother will die).
I've done some research and have found no (0) situations where abortion is a life saving procedure.
Yeah, none of you like reality so- throw a tantrum instead.
Good job :wave2:
Everybody on this site is 'unnecessarily disruptive', reporting people on here is out of straight manipulation- I don't actually see anyone who 'goes red' as actually having deserved it
When your basis is 'still coulda maybe', no situation is going to seem to warrant abortion.
You should do some research and find that your notion that fetuses equating to living souls doesn't actually exist anywhere except in the imagination Pope Sixtus- and you 'evangelicals'- created.
Israel allows emergency abortion, but their just heretics right :chuckle:
They believe that you're not a living soul until you're halfway through the birth canal.
I wonder why that is
glassjester
Well-known member
Drop this straw man, Brother. It's doing you no good.
Nowhere in United States civil or criminal law is the protection of innocent human life predicated on the presence of a soul.
Legally speaking, it doesn't matter if anyone has a soul or not.
Do you have to prove an adult murder victim has a soul in order to prosecute the murderer?
Get real.
glassjester
Well-known member
Yes.
And in cases of measles, Crucible is right, in that an abortion is less risky (for the mother only, obviously) when compared to child birth.
Souls are self evident, it's why we don't cringe at a tree being chopped to pieces.
The more like God a soul is, the more importance we give it- an animal's soul is not as a human soul. And a fetus contains no soul at all- it is simply a vessel.
Most pro-lifers however don't have any sort of education on souls- go ask most of them and they'll tell you that only humans have souls.
I simply just have never taken them seriously. And with your church, it's all due to a pope's knee jerk response to abortion during the early Late Ages.
glassjester
Well-known member
What do you suppose an animal's body would be like if it had no soul?
glassjester
Well-known member
A soul is not something you see, it is something you intuitively know is there in being a soul yourself. If you had to choose between a toddler and a fetus, you would choose the toddler.
The problem is that you all are just plain dishonest. It's all built on a self righteous lie, which you all need to acknowledge.
If abortion is murder than why aren't you calling for the women to be charged with it? Why aren't you calling for the doctors to be rounded up like the gestapos in WWII?
When it comes down to it, you're all just a bunch of vain people trying to throw the living under the bus for your bogus cause- forget the homeless, the economy, or anything else- most of you people voted according to who will try (and fail) to ban abortion.
It's ABSURD.
glassjester
Well-known member
True, but I have seen many adult animal bodies without souls. Haven't you?
You know what they're like.
Didn't someone just mention something about pro-choice cognitive dissonance?
You've just thrown a wrench into that machination.
What do you think pro-life protesters do? There's at least one pro-life group that I know of in Denver, CO, that has a protest outside of Planned Parenthood on every day that PP is open, and protests outside of the abortionists' homes on every holiday.
Sent from my Pixel XL using TheologyOnline mobile app
Yeah, none of you like reality so- throw a tantrum instead.
Good job :wave2:
Everybody on this site is 'unnecessarily disruptive', reporting people on here is out of straight manipulation- I don't actually see anyone who 'goes red' as actually having deserved it
In my opinion, you deserved to be banned. TOL deserved a vacation from your non-sense. Hopefully, someday you'll mature and become more mentally stable?
Says the guy who obviously got a talking to for their rampant spam posting which trolled or slandered anyone who disagreed with you :loser:
The reason I was banned was die to saying 'damn holy book' rather then simply 'holy book', and was told to tone it down.
That is not the reason however why it was reported. It was reported for the reason I outlined- because you all are a bunch of self-righteous loons who think I'll be banned simply for going against yall's collective bias.
Still ranting and raving, huh? Perhaps you need some therapy for your "Anger Issues?"
You must be hearing voices in your head. Nobody gave me a "What for."