citeAimiel said:You can't separate define someone as a non-being by those type of standards, just for convienience sake. You're trying to find a way to justify murdering that tiny little baby, because you 'say' it is not a living being yet. That it is not capable of thought. That it is not 'viable.' Well, if you weren't given food after you were born, you would have died. That is murder, whether or not you ever had a brain or a thought.
Do you eat mean Aimiel? Hell, have you ever had a salad?
If so, then you are a murderer on a far greater scale than any pro-abortionist. Cows, fish and plant life, while alive, are not capable of thought and yet we end their lives every single day. There has yet to be a single plant that has ever had either a brain or a thought and yet we end their lives every day.
Who are you to make that distinction?
Another question. How much money/time/resources have you donated to a pro-life/anti-abortion organization? And how much money/time/resources have you donated to an abused/homeless/unwanted child organization?
The thing that I have found, is that more "pro-lifers" are not that. They are not "pro-life". They are "pro-new-life" because they want as many new, fresh little minds running around as possible in order to further spread their religious beliefs.
And out of curisiouity, this question is directed to those who feel it is okay to kill abortionists:
Do you feel the same way towards all those parents who murder their own kids? Is it okay to go and shoot them or blow up their homes?