All you did was point your "one size fits all" bias all over Scriptures that are not even speaking of the same issues, and forced them into saying the same thing.
Interplanner commended you because he too hasn't a clue what Romans 9-11 is actually all about.
Case in point; this here - Romans 9's:
1. I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost,
2. That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart.
3. For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:
4. Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;
5. Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.
Is speaking of this here - "my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:
4. Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;
5. Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is over all, God blessed for ever. Amen.
In relation to this here - 1. I say the truth in Christ, I lie not, my conscience also bearing me witness in the Holy Ghost,
2. That I have great heaviness and continual sorrow in my heart.
3. For I could wish that myself were accursed from Christ for my brethren, my kinsmen according to the flesh:
He is speaking about Israel, but you have twisted all this that it fit your bias.
He has just finished eight chapters dealing with the issue of God's New Agency; the Body of Christ, and now turns to an issue he has to deal with - the issue of what has become of God's agency: Israel, that it looks as if it is over for that nation.
He then proceeds to deal with the answer to that; to what things appear to look like as concerning Israel, that it appears God is through with His plans and purpose in Himself as to them.
He then goes into that:
6. Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect. For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:
7. Neither, because they are the seed of Abraham, are they all children: but, In Isaac shall thy seed be called.
You see those 11 words - "Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect."
He is saying that although it looks like all is lost for Israel, such is not the case; that it is "Not as though the word of God hath taken none effect."
That though such was the case with many, such was not the case with all - "For they are not all Israel, which are of Israel:"
Just as all who were the seed of Abraham, were not the children of the promise; in other words, just as only those who were the seed of that promised child: Isaac, were the seed.
8. That is, They which are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God: but the children of the promise are counted for the seed.
9. For this is the word of promise, At this time will I come, and Sarah shall have a son.
He is illustrating a principle or general rule of thumb by which we Gentiles - who actually take His Word "as it is written" - can know what all was going on as to Israel; that we not end up wise in our own conceits out of our ignorance of this issue and conclude that as far as God's plans and purpose as to this here:
4. Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises;
"...the word of God hath taken none effect."
This is an issue Paul takes up three chapters laying out the truth of, but that you and yours completely twist into some thing else altogether.
One principle is that the Israelites consisted of two kinds - all Israel, and, their believing remnant - Romans 11:
7. What then? Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded.
Note - "Israel hath not obtained that which he seeketh for; but the election hath obtained it, and the rest were blinded."
Israel that was not Israel, hath not obtained it - their election was Israel; they obtained it - the rest - Israel that was not Israel, were blinded.
Romans 3:
1. What advantage then hath the Jew? Or what profit is there of circumcision?
2. Much every way: chiefly, because that unto them were committed the oracles of God.
3. For what if some did not believe? Shall their unbelief make the faith of God without effect?
What faith of God? This issue of the status of God's plans and purpose as to Israel that Paul will expand greatly on in Romans 9-11.
Anyone without an ax to grind - who simply takes the passages as Paul has laid them out, cannot but conclude this very short synopsis, is what Paul is talking about, and about to expand greatly on.
