As a fellow under 1 ban club member, I predict that one of us isn't going to make it through 2009 with these new guidelines.
Do you want to lay odds who will be banned first?
A New Standard of Interaction on TheologyOnline
- Thread starter Nathon Detroit
- Start date
As a fellow under 1 ban club member, I predict that one of us isn't going to make it through 2009 with these new guidelines.
Do you want to lay odds who will be banned first?
The Graphite
New member
I don't see why I should change anything... :angel:
The Graphite
New member
On another note, it's going to be interesting watching Nick adjust to the new way... 
assuranceagent
New member
I have another.... we'll say, "friend", who wants to know if the more codial approach will also be applied to rep comments, or if he (or it could be a 'she,' you never know :noid: ) will still be able to call people the clever names that come to mind....
For example, let's assume this..."friend" wanted to refer to someone as an 'evil demon.' (just a random example, of course.) Would that be alrighty? :idunno:
For example, let's assume this..."friend" wanted to refer to someone as an 'evil demon.' (just a random example, of course.) Would that be alrighty? :idunno:
assuranceagent
New member
Hey! I'm a member of that club too!
We should start a TOL social group!
...though something tells me it'd be terribly boring :think:
The Graphite
New member
Nick: "You are a godless, heathen piece of bantha manure! . . . but I do mean that in the nicest way possible." :angel:
assuranceagent
New member
assuranceagent
New member
Well... obviously I don't snoop through rep comments but if there was a on-going problem we might look into it.
For the most part I just ignore nasty rep comments.
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
You can start by nicing up that fist in your avatar. I find it threatening.
There's not even any blood on the bandage.
assuranceagent
New member
assuranceagent
New member
There's not even any blood on the bandage.
Yet.
I said I found it threatening, not accomplished.
lain:
dreadknought
New member
Never heard of any of them. :idunno:
If AMR was interested I would consider it.
:noid: I thought AMR was already Ask Mr. Religion, not Ask Mr. Religion???
C
cattyfan
Guest
I banned Prakk for promoting sex with children. That is still waaaaay over the tolerance line.
There ya go!
Ain't no doubt about that! :up:
assuranceagent
New member
Is this a subtle way to get Lighthouse to stop posting here?? :think:
But for serious, good move. I applaud the decision. :thumb: Long time coming...
In 2010 we begin our 'no jive turkey' initiative. Your byline will have to go.