Originally posted by Spartin
Point #7 Posted just like a fish in a small pond. You have obviously shown that there is no real concrete knowledge behind such a statement. The bible if full of discrepencies, yet you believe it over the scientific community. They admit to mistakes, yet the people with the bible in thier hands don't. Good closed mind.
Without going into a huge statement concerning Creationism vs. evolution, I'll just suggest that you read all of the evidence given in Battle Royal VII by Pastor Enyart. If all of the proof he gives for God's creation does not satisfy you then it's obvious that you have no real desire for truth. There will be no point in taking this any further if that is the case.
Originally posted by Spartin
Point #8 Just like that infallible book states...ummm ya. That is just fear of something you don't know holding power over you. Good to see the closed mind is staying that way. At least it is something you do know how to do. It also isn't your job to make fun of him like that anyways.
I am commanded to judge by the Bible and I know that I did not unfairly judge Cgregory. Enough Said. Even if Cgregory is not a homosexual, he still bears guilt for supporting their immoral lifestyle. God specifically addresses the evil of this lifestyle in Romans 1:26-27. You should go check it out and wake up out of that liberal comatose state.
Brellix
Point #1
Plain and simple, Jesus was just a remarkable man. Not the mythical being you make him out to be. Just a method to keep the masses in line for keeping power for the church. Without that mythical being, there is no godly basis for your "truthful Bible". Leaves you on shakey ground at best.
Point #2
Check up on your history books (the ones not tainted by creationist coloring) and you will see that the Egyptians were starting to build thier cities during the time of the flood. The Egyptians are notorious for recording thier day to day lives, yet they don't say anything about a world encompassing flood. They have a flood myth too, it just doesn't cover the whole world, and it is at a different time period than yours. Which one is right?
Point #3
You really should look up your Scientific data more closely. What Bob is throwing out is just church propaganda. He doesn't even have a proper grasp on the material. He makes sweeping eloquent responses in science, but uses the material in a shaded way. His data is setup like someone taking a post out of context. He hears what he wants and everything else is irrelevant. His current "scientific arguement" is laughable at best. The base pairs in a protien compared to the alphabet in order is just a wrong comparision. He is assuming it comes in one big step. That is fairly limited don't you think? Just like baking a cake, can't just drop the ingredients in the oven and poof there is a cake. (Sounds like the arguement you guys make about creating protiens doesn't it???) Top it all off, because there is electrical attractions to molecules (which Bob the scientist totally ignores) it would make the ratio he is throwing out totally wrong. Now if our protiens were made of dice with a-z, then his comparision would be correct. Electrical attractions will make it so d skips over ab and get right after c because thats where its most stable state is. In chemistry, the most stable is the most desireable for molecules. Refute that please. Different ball game and he is throwing a football in a baseball diamond.
Point #4
Well if the Bible (which is just literature written by man) gives you the right to judge people like that, good luck to you. When this whole show of life is over, we will see who is right in the end. I have a strong feeling I am correct. There is a God, just not the corrupted version Christians spout out. If by some off chance yours is correct, well I guess I am going to Hell because I refuse to treat my fellow man less than just that. I would prefer it there due to the fact that at least I got there by being a human. Not a self-righteous donkey.
By the way, thanks for calling me Liberal. It is far better to look to the future than the past like you are. You keep looking over your back to the heyday of your religion. You are liable to walk into a telephone post because you are looking the wrong way.
Spartin