31 Reasons To Reject The Jab

marke

Well-known member
I can understand your opposition to mandates. First, it's mandates for vaccines. And then, just maybe, mandates against lying on internet forums.

Then where would you be?
If wicked fascist democrats get their way all conservative and Christian voices will be silenced and the only news or information allowed to air will be lying leftist propaganda, like in North Korea, a nation ruled by other fascist leftist savages similar to barbarian baboons and American democrats.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
  • Because it makes the state a ton of money.
  • Because if makes people feel safe when the government runs their lives.
  • Because if everyone had to be responsible for their own actions, then where would we be?

If we went with a national DNA database, then we wouldn't need driver's licenses/IDs.
 

expos4ever

Well-known member
If wicked fascist democrats get their way all conservative and Christian voices will be silenced and the only news or information allowed to air will be lying leftist propaganda, like in North Korea, a nation ruled by other fascist leftist savages similar to barbarian baboons and American democrats.
It is almost as if you use a blender to compose your posts - you toss in a random selection of demonizing terms and let 'er rip.

It is beyond ironic that you decry propaganda - many, perhaps most, of your posts are pure demonizing rhetoric, unalloyed by even a scintilla of rational argument or supporting evidence.

And those are the posts that are not outright lies.
 

Mary Contrary 999

Active member
  • Because it makes the state a ton of money.
  • Because it makes people feel safe when the government runs their lives.
  • Because if everyone had to be responsible for their own actions, then where would we be?
And people should be allowed to drive on either side of the highway if they think traffic is light enough. Personal responsibility will reign.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
And people should be allowed to drive on either side of the highway if they think traffic is light enough. Personal responsibility will reign.

The use of infrastructure (which is the government's responsibility to manage, one of the few things it DOES have the authority to control) is controlled by the government. If the government says drive on the roght side, and not the left, doing the opposite where prohibited should result in punishment if caught.
 

marke

Well-known member
We mandate tests to gain license to drive and vehicle inspection to drive. Why?
Driving tests are to ensure the proficiency of drivers. Government officials who mandate a dangerous vaccine while refusing to do serious testing on its potential hazardous side effects are extremely unwise.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
Driving tests are to ensure the proficiency of drivers.

Fat load of good it does. At least half of the people on the road these days would fail their driving test if I were their instructor.
 

marke

Well-known member
U.S. Added 678,000 Jobs In February As Omicron Eases -- Unemployment fell to 3.8% as the economy continues its pandemic recovery

It's nearly spring. It would be nice to get back some of the jobs lost to unnecessary panicdemon shutdowns. What we may not return to is Trump's energy independence when gasoline was more than $1 per gallon cheaper.
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
Links of interest to the topic:


 

marke

Well-known member
Links of interest to the topic:



Quotes:


From mid-December, 2020 through February 18, 2022, the U.S. government’s database, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), has received 1,134,984 reports of adverse events, including 24,402 deaths, following COVID vaccination. Additionally, there have been 4,021 cases of myocarditis and pericarditis in the U.S. with 2,475 cases associated with Pfizer, 1,364 cases with Moderna and 171 cases with J&J’s COVID vaccine. These include 643 reports of myocarditis and pericarditis in children aged 12 to 17.

“It would be criminal to expose infants and young children to this extremely risky product,” said Holland. “VAERS data show the catastrophic health impacts the vaccine is having on millions of people, yet Pfizer and other vaccine makers are raking in billions of dollars with no fear of being held accountable for injuries and deaths from their vaccines.”

The FDA’s attempt to suppress these data in support of the pharmaceutical industry’s bottom line isn’t a new phenomenon in this country’s public health system. For more information on pharmaceutical corruption and the tight relationship the industry has with government regulatory agencies, read The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health by CHD Chair and lead counsel Robert F. Kennedy,



The Sunday Times reported on 27 February this year that 920 coronavirus vaccination injury claims had been registered, but none has been accepted or been the subject of any payment. That article referred to Zion Spit, described as “a ridiculously healthy” 48-year-old antique dealer from Cumbria, whose death was confirmed as having been caused by the vaccine. His partner of 21 years and fiancée, Vikki Spit, has been in touch with me to express her solidarity with my efforts to obtain redress from the Government and her frustration at the Government’s refusal to engage with victims and their families.
 

Hoping

Well-known member
Banned
Driving tests are to ensure the proficiency of drivers. Government officials who mandate a dangerous vaccine while refusing to do serious testing on its potential hazardous side effects are extremely unwise.
Or desperate.
 

Idolater

"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
...

The FDA’s attempt to suppress these data
Yes...
in support of the pharmaceutical industry’s bottom line
No!!!!

This reminds me of gun control rhetoric, always trying to 'spin' the 'narrative' toward the NRA being solely interested in selling guns irresponsibly "in support of the [gun] industry's bottom line". That's not true of the NRA with gun control and it's not true of the FDA with the vaccine.
 

marke

Well-known member
Yes...

No!!!!

This reminds me of gun control rhetoric, always trying to 'spin' the 'narrative' toward the NRA being solely interested in selling guns irresponsibly "in support of the [gun] industry's bottom line". That's not true of the NRA with gun control and it's not true of the FDA with the vaccine.
Lobbying in DC is a multi-billion-dollar enterprise.


Companies, labor unions, trade associations and other influential organizations spend billions of dollars each year to lobby Congress and federal agencies. Some special interests retain lobbying firms, many of them located along Washington's legendary K Street; others have lobbyists working in-house.

Pharmaceutical companies spend money on lobbyists to improve their "bottom line." Lobbyists for pharmaceutical companies spend money greasing the palms of those individuals who can sway government organizations and lawmakers to get things done in their favor whether that entails cutting corners and bypassing standards like safety protocols or not.
 

way 2 go

Well-known member
media%2FFNJt2-NXMAIIkw9.jpg%3Fname%3Dorig


 
Top