2006 TOL Fantasy Football League

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lucky

Lucky

New member
Hall of Fame
drbrumley said:
Half my team was on a bye this week too.

I was lucky to win this week. Pun intended! :rotfl:
Click to expand...
And the Ligers would have lost no matter which players I would have started.
 
BillyBob

BillyBob

BANNED
Banned
Hey, this competition thing is fun! :banana:

It's a lot better than last year when I ran the table on you guys. :darwinsm:
 
Lucky

Lucky

New member
Hall of Fame
For the right pair of RBs, WRs, or RB/WR combo, I'd be willing to part with the monstrous Chicago DST.
 
Imrahil

Imrahil

New member
LIFETIME MEMBER
Lucky said:
For the right pair of RBs, WRs, or RB/WR combo, I'd be willing to part with the monstrous Chicago DST.
Click to expand...
Hey, at least you're doing better than me! I had a pretty good team last year. Now I'm at the bottom of the barrel.
 
Mr. 5020

Mr. 5020

New member
BillyBob said:
Hey, this competition thing is fun! :banana:

It's a lot better than last year when I ran the table on you guys. :darwinsm:
Click to expand...
:chuckle:

You and I are still tied for 1st in our division.
 
BillyBob

BillyBob

BANNED
Banned
I posted this at the FF site....but I never know if anybody reads this stuff.





Hey guys [and ......um....gals], I think the new restriction this year which requires at least 2 Rb's [no more than 3] and at least 3 WR's is too restrictive. Especially with the new Bye week schedule where more teams are on a bye in weeks 6 and 7. The RB/WR quota is making it difficult to field a decent team. It seems that we should be required 1 RB and 1 WR. The other 5 slots should be of any variation of RB/WR/TE a coach chooses.


I'm BillyBob and I approved this message. :D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top