Just because you have turned a blind eye to the massive evidence of democrat voter fraud does not mean everyone is blind also.
“2000 Mules” Is Taking on a Life of Its Own, And It Hasn’t Even Been Released Yet
- Thread starter Jefferson
- Start date
You are mistaken. It is you who have no evidence of voter fraud, not me.
Trump and Biden have been caught lying, whether intentionally or unintentionally. But only Trump has been caught promoting American capitalism over Marxist socialism.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I actually streamed this steaming pile of dross a coupla nights ago, well, half of it anyway and had to switch it off. Ironic really considering you'd have to switch your brain off to buy into any of it. Anyone who paid $30 to watch this bunk was well and truly ripped off, or indeed any money at all really...It's come out in the Dominion lawsuit that Tucker Carlson told his producer that Sydney Powell was "lying."
Whoops...
Yet, as the brief from voting equipment company Dominion Voting Systems in its multibillion-dollar defamation case against Fox News argues, the network still promoted false claims of election fraud, with conspiracy theories that Dominion machines were somehow used to steal the election from Trump. It’s worth reading the lengthy filing in its entirety, which begins by citing a communication from host Tucker Carlson to his producer in November 2020 that bluntly states, referring to a top election denier and MAGA lawyer, “Sidney Powell is lying.” It gets crazier from there.
No wonder Bill Barr burst out laughing when questioned about it.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
All starting to come out now...
Dominion is connected to George Soros, election fraud in other nations, and voting fraud in the US. The fact they filed a lawsuit against Fox News does not prove Fox News was wrong about them.
annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
I'll give you props for giving it a go. It's an embarrassment even more so now that it's come out that the Arizona AG intentionally sat on the revelation that there was no significant election fraud in Maricopa County. (Remember the Cyber Ninjas circus?)
PHOENIX — Nearly a year after the 2020 election, Arizona’s then-attorney general, Mark Brnovich, launched an investigation into voting in the state’s largest county that quickly consumed more than 10,000 hours of his staff’s time.
Investigators prepared a report in March 2022 stating that virtually all claims of error and malfeasance were unfounded, according to internal documents reviewed by The Washington Post. Brnovich, a Republican, kept it private.
In April, the attorney general — who was running in the GOP primary for a U.S. Senate seat — released an “Interim Report” claiming that his office had discovered “serious vulnerabilities.” He left out edits from his own investigators refuting his assertions.
His office then compiled an “Election Review Summary” in September that systematically refuted accusations of widespread fraud and made clear that none of the complaining parties — from state lawmakers to self-styled “election integrity” groups — had presented any evidence to support their claims. Brnovich left office last month without releasing the summary.
That timeline emerges from documents released to The Post this week by Brnovich’s successor, Kris Mayes, a Democrat. She said she considered the taxpayer-funded investigation closed and, earlier this month, notified leaders on Maricopa County’s governing board that they were no longer in the state’s crosshairs.
The records show how Brnovich used his office to further claims about voting in Maricopa County that his own staff considered inaccurate. They suggest that his team privately disregarded fact checks provided by state investigators while publicly promoting incomplete accounts of the office’s work. The innuendo and inaccuracies, circulated not just in the far reaches of the internet but with the imprimatur of the state’s attorney general, helped make Arizona an epicenter of distrust in the democratic process, eroding confidence in the 2020 vote as well as in subsequent elections.
Voter fraud is hard, if not impossible to uncover under present constraints, but democrats stole the election by fraud whether the fraud will ever be proven or not. And if common-sense barriers to fraud are not implemented democrats will continue to commit hard-to-detect voting fraud in future elections.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
An absolute farce of a "documentary". Anyone who bought into it should be embarrassed but some people are so invested into the whole fraud farce they obviously can't bring themselves to accept they've been so thoroughly duped. Dinesh must have been laughing his back off when folk paid to watch his "movie" but hey, Trump, as thick as he is has been doing the same along with Lake. Money to be made through scamming the gullible and the far right in America provide umpteen dollars worth...
Is it any wonder that revelations are coming about that Fox hosts et al were calling the whole election fraud bunk actual nonsense themselves? Couldn't do it in public obviously but now...
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Or, you could just stop stamping your feet and accept that most people who voted didn't want the bronzed buffoon back in office. Their votes mattered just as much as yours and they were legit. Only the utterly duped and gullible still bang on about widespread voter fraud three years down the line. There wasn't any.
Biden's following on the campaign trail was pathetic, yet precinct workers were treated on election night to middle-of-the-night floods of ballots for Biden that gave him 10 million more votes in the election than Obama had ever gotten. Since democrats refuse to prove the ballot dumps were all legitimate votes then I refuse to believe they did not commit massive voting fraud.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Ballot dumps wouldn't have been counted and you'd have to be seriously ignorant of how your own systems work on the score to even entertain the likes of 2000 Mules. Is it any wonder that Republicans are embarrassed by this garbage fest? You wanna delude yourself all ends up and sulk over 2020 then get on with it.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Then why did Fox distance themselves away from such claims along with the wingnut Sidney Powell? Heck, if Fox had proof of such then surely a network like that wouldn't have shied away from a lawsuit and gone to court to make their supposedly irrefutable case or at least one that could hold up?
Democrats have been stealing elections or trying to steal elections for decades by 'finding' missing ballots for their candidate days or weeks after the election that swung the election victory away from the republican winner on election night. That worked for Lyndon Johnson in 1948, JFK and LBJ in 1960, Al Franken in 2008, and Joe Biden in 2020. Brenda Snipes tried to steal the election from Trump in 2016 and there were other clear attempts by democrats to steal elections after the elections were over.
I do not know why people or organizations take the positions they take. All sorts of motivations affect people's judgments and public positions, including bias, allegiance to friends, devotion to political parties, money, popularity, and more.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Unsubstantiated horsefeathers.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
Well, here's a clue. Fox backed themselves away from the wingnut Sidney Powell and claims of fraud because they knew there was no substance to any of it.
https://www.usnews.com/opinion/blog...-have-won-his-senate-seat-through-voter-fraud
Al Franken May Have Won His Senate Seat Through Voter Fraud
It's time for real voter registration reform.
By Peter Roff
July 20, 2010
It looks increasingly likely that at least one member of the United States Senate may owe his seat in the world’s greatest deliberative body not to his charisma or the persuasiveness of his message but to voter fraud.
As the Wall Street Journal's John Fund reports, Minnesota Democrat Al Franken’s narrow, 312-vote victory in 2008 over incumbent Sen. Norm Coleman may have come as the result of people being allowed to vote who, under existing law, shouldn’t have been.
The certification of Franken as the victor came only after a series of recounts dragging out for almost half a year. It also sparked an investigation by Minnesota Majority, a conservative watchdog group that compared the list of those recorded as having voted in the election against what Fund calls “criminal rap sheets.” The group found, in what appears to clearly warrant further and official inquiry, that
… At least 341 convicted felons voted in Minneapolis's Hennepin County, the state's largest, and another 52 voted illegally in St. Paul's Ramsey County, the state's second largest. Dan McGrath, head of Minnesota Majority, says that only conclusive matches were included in the group's totals. The number of felons voting in those two counties alone exceeds Mr. Franken's victory margin.
Thus far no one is calling for the results to be overturned. Indeed Dan McGrath, who spearheaded the inquiry, told Fox News, "We aren't trying to change the result of the last election. That legally can't be done." He added: “We are just trying to make sure the integrity of the next election isn't compromised."
McGrath’s point is a good one. The only question is how the integrity of U.S. elections can be maintained when senior policymakers inside the United States Department of Justice, through their actions and instructions to their staffs, do not seem to believe that voter fraud exists or, if it does, that it is not worth investigating.
Who needs Fox News when we have the Gateway Pundit and US News and World Report?
https://www.usnews.com/debate-club/...raud-is-a-proven-election-manipulation-tactic
https://www.usnews.com/emailprefs/l...raud-is-a-proven-election-manipulation-tactic
Voter Fraud Is a Proven Election Manipulation Tactic
By Hans A. Von Spakovsky|
June 13, 2012
The Supreme Court answered this question in 2008 when it upheld Indiana's voter ID law. "Flagrant examples of such fraud … have been documented throughout this Nation's history by respected historians and journalists," the court said, "[and] not only is the risk of voter fraud real but that it could affect the outcome of a close election." But ask voters in Troy, N.Y., Lincoln County, W.Va., and Florida whether voter fraud is a real problem.
Four local officials and party activists were convicted in 2011 of voter fraud in Troy for forging enough absentee ballots to "likely have tipped the city council and county elections" in 2009. Two veteran Democratic political operatives said voter fraud is an accepted way of winning elections. One of them who pled guilty, Anthony DeFiglio, told police that such fraud was a "normal political tactic.".]
And it is the most vulnerable who are far too often the victims of vote thieves. DeFiglio admitted that the "people who are targeted live in low-income housing … [T]here is a sense that they are a lot less likely to ask any questions."
In March 2012, the county sheriff and clerk in Lincoln County, W.Va., pled guilty to voter fraud. They stuffed enough bogus absentee ballots into ballot boxes to change the outcome of a 2010 Democratic primary election. Was this a one-time incident? Probably not, since the Lincoln County auditor was also found guilty of voter fraud in 2005.
[See photos of Wisconsin Voters Heading to the Polls]
An ongoing review of voter registration rolls in Florida has already found almost 100 confirmed non-citizens registered to vote, half of whom voted in at least one previous election; this in a state that decided the 2000 presidential election by slightly more than 500 votes. During the Bush administration, the Justice Department convicted more than a dozen non-citizens of illegally registering and voting in Florida elections. And the state has thousands more possibly unlawful registrations to investigate.
As the Supreme Court said, vote fraud has been present in our elections throughout our entire history. There are individuals who are willing to take advantage when they see an opportunity to steal an election. We need to be sure that every eligible American is able to vote, but we also need to take the steps necessary to ensure the integrity of our election process.