Search results

  1. A

    Is there any obvious evidence today for the biblical global Flood?

    has anyone every provided an answer to what happens to all the heat (h bomb equivalents) brown has suggested? where does that go?
  2. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    actually she is not very good at reading or typing. lacks a certain amount of brain power and manual dexterity. she can run really really fast though and can her ability to smell things is really really much better than mine. different evolutionary branches on that tree of life
  3. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    alate who you referenced seemed to have a pretty good handle on niology. but please provide evidence for your claim that darwinists have been on earth for 4.5 billion years. it pains me to say this to someone who has a command of english, but you are simply brutally ignorant. i would do better...
  4. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    well first question is to define “human”. all genus Homo or just H sapiens? but you know the answer—evolution. which you already accept in terms of “branching out” after creation and or the flood
  5. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    actually even taxonomy based on morphology can depend on appearances. some taxonomists are lumpers and some splitters
  6. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    Today genetics is also used
  7. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    no
  8. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    taxonomy is the classification of things according to their characteristics. i think we are speaking of the classification of living things according to their characteristics. i’m not sure what you mean by defining it as “affirming propositions”
  9. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    well i must apologize for this post. since i have asked specific questions expecting answers i should expect to respond to specific questions with specific answers as much as possible and not allow myself to get frustrated
  10. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    i always find it pathetic when people like RD and 7 here attempt to discuss science when they are ignorant of the topic
  11. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    ahhh, so you just don’t understand evolution. individuals don’t evolve. populations evolve.
  12. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    what does “branched out” mean? what do you think taxonomy is?
  13. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    more suggestions that you did not read the article. if you read it you would at least be aware of the term hominin and might have been curious enough to find out what it means do you really think ewoks and the tooth fairy are real?
  14. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    hominin is a simple taxonomic term. look it up
  15. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    no, do you not know what the term refers to? google it
  16. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    so can we tell which layer is the first laid down by the flood? still no answer to the question of which hominins are pre and post flood and no specifics as to why the k-t boundary is a myth
  17. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    So can we tell where the top of the flood is in the column. How about the bottom? My question about whether or not various hominins were on the ark had nothing to do with ancestry. K-T boundary, I thought that was pretty well agreed to by geologists---the big meteor strike etc causing all that...
  18. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    But you must have some explanation as to where all those fossil hominins were in relation to the ark and the flood. If they were in existence at the time of the flood, were they separate kinds and should have been all on the ark and then became extinct afterwards? Or are they all genus Homo and...
  19. A

    more Darwinist self-defeat

    No answer to my specific question?
Top