Search results

You're a bundle of contradictions, aren't you.

I think it might be applicable in a metaphorical and literal sense: Malachi 3:10 Bring all the tithes into the storehouse, That there may be food in My house, And try Me now in this,” Says the LORD of hosts, “If I will not open for you the windows of heaven And pour out for you such blessing...

So we would have been justified in sending cluster bombs to Baghdad for them to use on London.

The dichotomy would be: A) Fall back, or B) Keep going away. Orbitization needs rockets.

Was England right to invade Iraq?

Don't forget Pluto! And Charon.

Wait. Santa and the Easter Bunny are related??!!

I'm sure you'll get booted off, too. Not for this post, but. :)

Men are from Mars, women are from Venus, Chaldeans are from Saturn.

There's a first time for everything. :)

Essentially all of it. No. The heat from the precipitation of carbonites went into the water. That energy turned kinetic when the fountains of the great deep broke forth. There was a cap on the heat-carrying capacity of the water before it ruptured its container. The heating came from tidal...

Let's be clear, all energy will eventually be counted as heat. The point with the illustrations is to show that the movement does not lead to the direct heating of the water, atmosphere or rock. It goes to other forms first. Dropping the rock in the bucket moves the water like the hydroplate...

Prior to that the plates were pushing water into the sky. Most of the energy went to accelerating the fountains.

Only negligible amounts went to heat, ie, (the net descent multiplied by mass) minus (the energy imparted to accelerate water plus negligible other forms). If you drop a rock into a bucket of water, the energy goes to moving the water around, not heat. If you skip a rock off a river and onto...

Sure. But the sideways movement is where all the energy budget goes. At the end of the fast phase, they piled upward. The energy is stored as potential in the continents. The energy did not go to heat.

Wait. No. Are you? Now I'm confused. Lol

Right you are.

She describes the supposed problem 15 minutes in. The quantity matters because of the amount of calcite (carbonates) that need to form, a slightly exothermic process. Where those carbonates are sourced is different for her model than for Walt Brown's, but she doesn't make the adjustment...

The only movement worth considering is the lateral sliding of the hydroplates. When they stopped, the energy went to potential (and is being slowly released to today). The real heat problem is at the core. And, yeah, it genuinely is a problem. But for life, not for the HPT.

Yeah, you mean like in that video? I think that is based on the assumption that all the carbonate needed for the cement was derived from living organisms. That's not what the HPT proposes. Before the flood, supercritical water in the subterranean chamber steadily dissolved certain minerals in...