Search results

Ummm, any actual, you know, evidence?

What actual evidence do you have for either of these assertions?

I find such statement puzzling - surely you must know that while 90% of the population may be at very low risk for covid complications, that 90% can transmit it to the 10% who are at risk.

Glad to see you are demonstrating your usual even-handedness and sensitivity in your posts.

Misleading (again). I would be stunned if you have credible evidence that a lab in Wuhan developed the coronavirus. But let's say you are right - that a lab in Wuhan did indeed develop the coronavirus. It should not have to be said that Fauci's funding of such a lab in Wuhan only puts him in...

What science was overturned?

Shifting the goalposts. When challenged on your claim that masks don't work, do you provide evidence for your claim? Nay - you sail off on a tangent about how we no longer need masks. Different question.

How about one, just one example, of any of us on the "left" in this or any other thread, doing this (shifting the burden of proof). Good luck with your search.

Let's go slowly - do you, or do not understand that mask-wearing is but one of many factors that determines cases? Actually, it is actually almost impossible that you do not understand this. So why are you intentionally misrepresenting the truth by such a graph?

....and the right winger fails to understand that he (or she) needs to actually make a case that Fauci knew, or should have known, that such funding would lead to the coronavirus (if this is indeed what happened). Once more, the right-winger equates correlation with causation.

Consider a 60 year old named Fred born with heart disease that would kill him at 70 if he does not otherwise get sick with something. Covid Situation: Fred gets Covid and dies in 2 weeks. We can reasonably say that Covid killed Fred even though his heart disease played a role. Fred would have...

It is sad to say, but guaranteed to be true - some people will needlessly die by waiting this extra six months. You guys always bend the truth about this. Yes, the vaccine is almost certainly not tested as much as would be ideal. And yes, the vaccine will kill some people. But we are in a...

Ah yes, the all-too-familiar argument-by-slogan. You, and others, do this a lot - you cannot support your claims with credible evidence so you speculate that those who disagree with you are somehow biased. Must be nice to read minds. The simple fact is this: in the normal world, as contrasted...

I know I do not need to tell you this, but it needs to be said that when you are trying to defend a position that cannot be sustained with reliable evidence, you have no choice but to do things like post provocative gifs and cartoons, or post videos of people with unknown credentials, or use...

Let's say this is true. What is your point? Unless you can make a case that Dr. Fauci knew, or should reasonably have known, that such money would be used to produce the coronavirus, I see point to all this.

It's difficult to keep track of your abject falsehoods - there so many. So perhaps I have answered before. The facts are these: what evidence there is clearly shows that properly worn masks do have a benefit, overall. To assert otherwise is incorrect. But prove me wrong. Point me to a post, any...

Yes, there is a risk of death after the covid vaccine - everybody dies after the covid vaccine. Of course everybody dies after being born.

Oy vey. I think I see what you are trying to do here. Congratulations, you have developed quite the repertoire of misleading arguments. This one, I will admit, is rather subtle. Well-played. I have not done my homework on this but I can pretty much guarantee you are making this (invalid)...

Of course, you wouldn't be using the term "wuflu" to stir up xenophobic sentiment, would you? Perish the thought. Anyhoo, it would be kind of nice if you presented, you know, actual credible evidence to support this statement.

Massively deceiving, of course. And consider your source - that e-rag known as gateway pundit. Here are some gems about this august publication: In August 2019, journalism professors Erik P. Bucy and John E. Newhagen observed that "The most aggressive fake news sites and associated YouTube...