Search results

No we do not know this - this may suit your narrative, but you are speculating.

I realize this may escape your razor-sharp intellect, but if an 86 year old dies within hours of reading one of your brilliant posts, this does not mean that the content of your post did him in. On second thought......

Ummm, what actual, you know, evidence, do you have that Mr. Aaron was "perfectly healthy". How many 86 year olds do you know who are "perfectly healthy"?

There is zero evidence - and I know you hate the "E"-word - that Hank Aaron died as a consequence of the covid vaccine. The fact that an 86 year old man died shortly after taking the vaccine does not imply the vaccine caused his death.

You lie. Again. There is tons of evidence that masks work. Want me to provide such evidence? All you have to do is ask.

Ah yes, Christian love in action - let these "old people" slip silently into the night. No wonder the church is a laughingstock.

How about some evidence that the vaccines are not working?

True, not against forum rules, though.

What actual evidence do you have that I am stupid - cite just one statement of mine that you claim is stupid and show us why such a statement is stupid. I guarantee you will fail. What we do have evidence for, of course, is that you are a liar. You claim there is evidence in this statement of...

Evasive. Once again: Whether you die "directly" from covid, or whether the virus "combines" with other diseases to kill you, you are still dead. The important point is that had you not contracted covid, you would not have died from these other diseases (at least not nearly as soon).

You keep repeating the same meaningless phrase. My point was clear - please address it: you are attempting to dupe the unsophisticated reader who does not understand that all sorts of other factors can cause infections to increase even if masks are acting to lessen the degree of increase...

"I am talking only about the disease, not the death by reaction to the disease". This sounds very much like the misleading argument that only 6 % of covid deaths are attributable to the virus, the other 94% are attributable to other conditions (diabetes, asthma, heart disease, etc.). Whether...

Again, as you have been repeatedly told, there are many variables other than masks that contribute to covid levels. So unless your analysis accounts for these other factors, the chart proves nothing. You know this - it is not plausible that you lack the cognitive capabilities to recognize this...

Prove what wrong? My statement is correct.

Not sure exactly what you are saying. To demonstrate the efficacy, or lack thereof, of masks, based on rates of covid in the population, requires carefully accounting for other factors like the ones I have mentioned.

A new variant arising, public health restrictions other than masks, massive religious festivals (I think this was a factor in India), seasonality (people spend more time indoors in winter). All these factors also play a role in determining the level of infection. To show a plot that shows that...

I do not follow the reasoning here. A chart that shows that mask and unmasked populations are affected similarly shows nothing unless everything else is equal. People on this site have repeatedly attempted to distort by posting charts like this - they show a chart that shows that infections...

Yes, of course. That has been my point all along. There is no lie, here.

On a conciliatory note, this is a valid question. I suspect she was indeed trying to avoid the question. But, to be fair, that is not really the same as lying. But I see no reason to think she was trying to cast anyone as a liar.

She never said "I have been to the border". She said "We've been to the border". I have already explained why this way of speaking does not constitute a lie. And you and your buddies, naturally enough, have not been able to critique my explanation as to why what she said was not a lie. And so...