Search results

So, you did actually do something about it then didn't you? You sought medical help. Good for you. That was the sensible thing to do.

Do 'smart Christians' just ignore signs of disease of any sort in your opinion?

Your wallpaper probably would as well...;)

Seriously, you think that masks and vaccines are more dangerous than a virus?! Okayyyy then...

Was Lazarus simply a "homeless bum" because of the decisions he'd made? Did he deserve the consequences of his actions? To be reduced to begging for scraps of food and having dogs licking his sores? Because that's the essence of your argument where it comes to homeless people, that they've all...

So you haven't got any then? Otherwise, I often provide sources to back up or substantiate assertions rather than "I say so".

Don't confuse people with facts, they don't like it...

Then provide it. Otherwise it is 'just you saying so' and can be dismissed accordingly.

Um, nope, didn't say any of that if you read back and with some understanding of context.

Yeah, that was...something.

As before, a woman can have support elsewhere without needing to seek a husband or a partner even. Your latter is just the 'height' of arrogance. Who do you get to determine as "losers"?

There's plenty of women who can take care of themselves and as before, if a woman wants to get married and have as you describe, then absolutely fine.

You've taken that Paul quote and reduced it to something that wouldn't remotely apply to a myriad settings in the present. In your "utopia", people would starve if they weren't working even if willing and able and those who couldn't would be reliant on family and friends never mind their ability...

Because you say so?

Um, not necessarily at all. Your paradigm isn't one that would suit all women and your latter is just arrogant bunk.

It's only "better" if that's what a woman wants. Otherwise, is that hard for you to handle?

Um, yeah, cos the CDC works on listening to opinion as oppose to accumulating and extrapolating data and formulating guidance on the results that such findings bring about while under continual scrutiny etc. Good. I ain't.

And yet another irony meter goes into the clouds...

Alert the CDC, I'm sure they'd love to hear from you.

Well, considering you've stated that a woman isn't obliged to get married then one with a child isn't obliged to do so either, is she?