Search results

So, you weren't referring to Covid at all with the following then? "I think the arguments you and marke have been making ignore the fact that many of the vaccines that have been created were done so by using the body parts and tissues of dead babies. If there was any reason to reject the...

She can support who she likes and be pro life. Like the Republican party is so staunchly anti abortion...

I do, he's right. It's a complete farce and they most assuredly do look like idiots. It's a laughing stock. The article points out as to why, as if most people didn't already know. As to your latter and as I've stipulated before, had there been any foundation to allegations of fraud and such had...

I don't have a problem thanks RD. :)

He did not "prove" any such thing as has been summarily outlined by varying people who are experts in the field and who you completely ignore. They make sense, you and this guy do not but of course it's entirely your prerogative to believe as you will of course.

Well, I've heard some out there conspiracy theories from the far right but this one's a doozy... For morbid curiosity's sake: Evidence?

Sums this fiasco up... https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/republican-arizona-audit-trump-idiots-b1845237.html

"Fauci helped invent Covid"??! Okie dokie then...

Says the expert...

No, they are not "demonstrably" wrong. If your yardstick for 'evidence' is a guy doing an experiment on YT then it most certainly does fit your preferred narrative because it's been summarily dismissed and touted as misleading and disinformation by experts, those of which you dismiss. I don't...

So you had a link whereby a company has stopped using aborted fetal cell lines in its polio vaccine. Cool. Doesn't alter the fact that Covid vaccines aren't using such anyway.

Oh, is this where I'm guilty of not 'considering evidence' if I don't happen to listen to a Kgov podcast? Why should I be obliged to do that exactly? How about you set out the salient points from it that prove that which you claim and let's go from there?

Not really... Right, you aren't, so why should anything you put up that runs against established clinics and bodies that specialise in virology etc be given any sort of credence? Because they fit your preferred narrative? That's not how things work and expertise isn't to be given short shrift...

Kgov?! Pass.

Yes, you are. You parrot on about aerosol particles et al as if you're an expert on the spread of virus transmission when you're only going on what you've seen in them and then expect others to give credence to the same videos you post that run contrary to expert opinion on the matter, else why...

Did you read the entire article and the summary as I've edited above? Is your sole point that some of the research revolved around a case from 1973? These vaccines are not using tissues from dead babies JR.

https://factcheckni.org/articles/covid-19-vaccines-and-aborted-fetuses/ The summary of this article being for those who may not read: No COVID-19 vaccine contains cells from aborted fetuses. A replica cell line from a fetus aborted in 1973 was used to develop the AstraZeneca/Oxford...

Well, yes you are. You're claiming such because you've seen a video on YT and have brought into his narrative, that's it. You buy into his demonstration and subsequent explanations why, exactly? You've no expertise on the matter have you? How do you know that his 'demonstration' trumps...

It's only poignant insofar as how tragically trite it is... I did think you were better than this.

Well, to be fair, in relation to Trump's self declared genius outbursts and the like, a foghorn would be measured sanity in comparison. However, yes, Biden does bring a far more measured and less vitriolic approach which was more than needed.