Search results

I'm calling the guy a quack because he absolutely is one, an absolute nutcase. Simple as that.

Oh, I'm aware that there's plenty of Trumpsters who haven't gotten over the election and want to buy into anything that casts doubt on the results but so what? Done and dusted. He lost. Deal with it.

Yeah, "The Epoch Times" again. Do you actually read anything outside of far right sources?

He doesn't "seem to be a quack", he absolutely is one. Where is America forcing everyone to take the vaccine exactly?

They're not wiping anything any such egg off their faces. Shame on those who still indulge this ridiculous farce. Trump lost, deservedly so. Deal with it.

Most folk outside of the rabid Trumpster brigade are already satisfied with the election results and confident with the process. Including republicans.

The reason they "failed to do a good job" is because of the complete lack of evidence that they'd have to bring to court.

Well, no. What's embarrassing is folk like Robin Bullock spouting said conspiracy garbage and those on the far right who endorse it and buy into it.

What?

Another sad indictment of the nuttiness that is so often prevalent with the far right. The sad thing is, some folk will actually buy into this clowns rhetoric. https://hillreporter.com/robin-bullock-tells-congregants-that-god-will-neutralize-covid-19-vaccine-if-they-pray-hard-enough-106876

Evidence? Was Mike Pence a 'Clinton operative' when he certified the election results for Biden? You are in no position whatsoever to call anyone dumb, the amount of asinine conspiracy rubbish you both lap up and peddle on here.

What "group" would that be exactly? A non partisan and completely objective one like "Cyber Ninjas"? What a joke.

When put on the spot over the issue, Trump's lawyers stopped short of claiming fraud once in court. Baseless allegations and unsubstantiated claims are one thing, committing perjury is another.

Oh, indeed. Some men seem to equate a woman having personal autonomy in her life with rabid feminism.

No, "risible" is the actual descriptor or "pathetic", there's quite a few appropriate adjectives to choose from in similar vein. So, you agree with Robertson that it's better to get teenage girls as young as 15 because if they get to 20 they'll only be interested in money and the like? How do...

No, because it was absolutely degrading and pathetic to boot. How is it 'sage advice' to encourage young men to get girls as young as 15 because if they wait until they're 19 or so they're suddenly going to *morph* into rabid and selfish feminists and the like? What kind of 'sage advice' is that?

Okay, you'll have to go into some more detail in regards to the former and in specific detail really. As regards Robertson, he was talking to a crowd, it's not difficult to find and so what if it was directed at 'younger men'? That make it all okay? Get over yourself with your' feminist'...

Robertson's statement is a problem because it's asinine and pathetic. Do you agree with him that men should get girls as young as 15 so as they do their bidding rather than 20 when they're not so easily manipulated or pliable as is his obvious implication and liable to pick their wallets? There...

Kinda just time for Trump to disappear from anything newsworthy and let his dingbat sycophants form their own ridiculous party...

If there was no refuting it then it would have been brought to the table in court by Trump's lawyers. Why didn't they?