Search results

Uh, an election isn't won within the first few hours so don't be dense in turn. Might as well argue that someone in front in a hundred metres final has won before the finishing line beckons. He might have been in front when he stupidly claimed victory but he was far behind when all the results...

Then there shouldn't be any difficulty in citing to a credible source then should there?

Valid election?! For shame! It's blatantly obvious that Trump won by 70 million votes that were somehow morphed into bamboo ballots and overturned by terminator type software etc etc...

Uh, yeah, this entire lnk undermines vaccination... *facepalm*

Credible cites, IOW, ones that aren't far right wingnut ones by all means.

Well, no, although this kind of stuff is certainly within your limited remit of pompous snark. You need to provide a cite for your suppositions as your word alone isn't worth anything in itself. Simple as that.

You do that, be more productive for ya.

Exactly. Why thwart anything if everything was above board?

There was nothing to challenge, so for once, Pence did do the right thing.

If anything he should be glad...

An embarrassment indeed. Won't stop some here from crying "Fraud!" til the proverbial cows come home or even if they don't and keep to better pastures...

Hmm, Jesus often spoke in parables in case you've forgotten so if too much intellect is your stumbling block then in itself, no, and not much of an argument on your part either. Frankly, how 'humble' do you think you generally come across on here? You make all sorts of sweeping statements...

Ah, the pompous "We" returns...! If only there was one given the nuttery going on around these here parts nowadays...

Gesundheit.

Meh, seen it already and not up to much.

Well, not a "Darwinist" but hey, gotta keep that pompous little trope going anyway eh? Anything of substance to support your little notion or is it just your little notion?

Um, in case you weren't somehow not already aware, your assertions are worth any number multiplied by 0. So, provide something (sensible) to back them up or get used to being dismissed. Pretty straightforward.

No, he's not and Clete is someone who I disagree with all ends up in the main and it's kinda hysterical to see this in some senses. He may be far right but he's not thick.

What an ignoramus.

Typical Stripe: Dumb Darwinist tropes that are completely irrelevant. Still no cite, just Stripe asserting something in want of support. Yawn and yawn again.