Search results

Oh, I think the crying is gonna go on for some time yet from the conspiracy crowd. Been nearly a year and the tears are still going strong...

How quaint! Meanwhile, in actual reality, Trump lost and the fraud conspiracy bunk is rightfully scorned, derided, mocked and satirised all ends up. When will the whining stop?

Nah, I didn't mean that but it sure seems to have you riled up. Facts of the matter are, Trump lost, no fraud has been uncovered despite laughable claims, investigations and audits and this was obvious from the get go to anyone with an ounce of common sense.

Funny isn't it? Everyone who claims they've got supposedly irrefutable proof of election fraud never actually get around to supplying it. From Trump's lawyers to Powell, Giuliani, Lindell to folk on here. The one common denominator amidst all of this farcical whining is a complete absence thereof.

Nah. Like I said you're in no position to even comment on it. Trump lost, get over it already. The MAGA brigade, conspiracy loons et al are a laughing stock.

It really would be interesting if someone here actually rose up to that challenge wouldn't it? It's not gonna happen obviously but it would be kinda fun to see...

Just to try and clarify things further from my perspective so here's an analogy that may - or more probably won't but I'm going to persist with it anyway - help. If I was an employer and my attention was brought to someone harassing a fellow employee for being gay in whatever form that might...

Well, if Trump's lawyers shied away from declaring actual fraud in court then it's a no brainer that nobody here has anything credible that a lawyer would risk their livelihood to perjure themselves on. Quite right regarding the appointees. Then again, they were probably all just RINO's for many...

Depends. There are rules in the workplace and certain things aren't deemed acceptable and that's across the board. For example, homophobia isn't tolerated so if an employee calls a co-worker a faggot or other derogatory terms then it's a disciplinary offence. It also cuts the other way. If...

Is this regarding someone who is transgender? I don't agree that you should be threatened with the loss of your job but the workplace isn't the arena for contentious issues really. If you're being issued with some sort of ultimatum that you have to acknowledge something publicly in order to...

Rather, you saw some stuff that you brought into and what has already been debunked all over the place but you keep to it because it fits your preferred narrative. You hated the results so of course, anything that hints at any foul play you'll lap up. Well, tough really. Much like plenty of folk...

I think some of these folk have simply convinced themselves on a subconscious level that there has to be substance to the claims even though there isn't. Again, a bit like the emperors new clothes. They know it's not there but they can't bring themselves to admit it. Fascinating on some levels.

Then supply it. Nobody else has so hey, the floor is yours!

Which roughly translated means you have nothing besides puerile little insults and nothing of substance to bring to the table - petty much like Trump's lawyers in court. The truth is readily apparent, Trump lost, end of story. If you buy into silly conspiracy narratives that have no foundation...

What rights do you believe are 'slipping away' exactly? What laws do you have a problem with? You have the freedom to believe as you want without persecution don't you? Other people don't, not without risk of harm and injustice. Your post seems entirely subjective without actual clarification.

Hmm, to say that we are not as free as a century ago is just nonsensical, it really is. We're much more free. Obvious examples being black people being able to sit on a bus without being expected to give up their seat and being able to use the same restrooms as white folk. Homosexuals being able...

Why would I want to read a lame little insult again? That's the recourse of those either lacking the intelligence to formulate a cohesive argument or who know full well they don't have one to bring. To be fair, you don't have one as there's no proof for widespread fraud which has been obvious to...

Sure we do but those rules have to have basis in common sense and logic, as we have now for the most part at least. There are rightfully laws against any form of violent assault, violation etc that hardly need explaining further. Draconian laws of times past that included the acceptance of...

Not to mention freedoms and civil liberties.

Well, it isn't really is it? :D