Search results

'Close'? Hardly. Trump lost by the exact same margin he claimed was a 'landslide victory' back in 2016. You keep with em' conspiracy tropes though Stripe!

Um, yeah, he was claiming victory Stripe. Well done for finally noticing. Not real interested in silly links from silly sources from the likes WTG thanks. In the real world it's done and dusted and has been for months. That some still can't come to terms with it is well, meh, whatever really.

Oh, that wasn't 'explanation' Stripe, that was just ignorant pomposity on you part. Quite up to speed with stuff thanks, for entertainment value it's been amusing to see the shenanigans unfold this last year, much fodder for satirists! Um, nah. It was settled long ago. You tell me, you're...

No but reading in a second language is. Deciphering Trumpersim has been quite an education...

Eh, it has been, for nigh on a year but for some, they just wanna cling onto conspiracy bunk and bat crazy sites that perpetuate what they so desperately want to hear. Oh well...

Dear oh dear, quite the deluded one aren't "we"? You're welcome to go with your own delusions but you're not welcome to invent your own "facts" Stripe. The fact of the matter is that forecasts were made on election night itself that accurately predicted a swing towards Biden once the mail in...

I watched it live at the time Stripe and I've seen the video. He claimed victory, was pathetic. So you didn't watch it live and see the forecasts predicted at the time then. I did and it wasn't a concoction made up the following day. That's fact so there's no need for any lies on my part you...

I'm sorry GD but there's no substance to this. Sure, some outlets will claim conspiracy, fraud, all manner of unsubstantiated stuff and after a myriad investigations/audits over the past year what have they come up with? Only confirmation that the allegations were baseless and that the election...

Oh, she lost big time, ain't denying that and neither could she. She was hardly a candidate fit for office either. The thing is, Trump was stomped by the same margin and he should have had the sense to concede in similar manner. Instead he's only caused damage to the republicans which is why...

Well, it was the BBC but this was all live and nobody doctored Trump's ill advised victory speech. The forecasts were all over news outlets that the mail in vote would overturn Trump's initial lead on the night itself...

Funny, I don't recall Clinton stamping her foot and whining on about fraud. I recall her conceding the results. Hilariously ironic that the likes of you go on about whining at all given the amount of snivelling and kindergarten hissy fits emanating from plenty in the Trump camp who still can't...

Nope. I've followed proceedings from the get go through the ongoing with a mixture of bemusement, incredulity and amusement. Sure he did Stripe, saw and heard him myself live on the night. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-us-2020-54811406...

The "canvas" has been addressed all ends up Stripe. Everything to do with anything resembling "improper" procedure has been found lacking in substance. Um, yeah, he did Stripe. One of the most stupid moves a president has ever made but pretty much in keeping with his narcissistic and petulant...

Um, yeah as it happens. The facts are not on your side. What your multiple personalities dictate is hardly relevant.

Well, what 'malarkey' exactly? That really was my honest view on proceedings and from election night itself. I'm a total cynic where it comes to politicians of any brand so the 'dems' aren't anything to shout about but this ongoing fraud stuff is really only embarrassing to republicans now...

Well, no, not really. Multiple investigations and audits later verified what most already knew. This whole thing effectively stemmed from Trump himself on election night. He gave a monumentally ill advised victory speech just a few hours after the initial votes had come in. Now he must have...

You, nor anyone else has brought anything of substance to the table regarding the subject matter. A whole load of waffle, conspiracy tripe and whining does not a substantive argument make.

Rather, your interpretation of it. Presumably you were referring to "hell" or "the lake of fire", neither of which the church has any concrete definition of. The views on them are myriad. I'm certainly not your judge, nor would I want to be or condemn you either.

You're not the judge of either although you represent the typical condemnatory attitude prevalent in fundamentalism unfortunately.

Like you know what anyone cares about. Yawn...