Search results

Curious and curiouser..

"Things of this world" like their family, loved ones? You're either a troll or are so misguided and ignorant to believe your own bile. Either way, a waste of time to engage with further. Fare thee well.

Sure, why aren't you showing charity and love toward the victims of an atrocious invasion of their homeland instead of judging them for not just upping sticks?

Well, sir, the priority for these people in the main, as for most in general, would be to live in peace and without persecution etc. Still, as you were..

Seems to be a repeating pattern with you...

Sure I did, else set yourself on fire and see how much eloquent and coherent speech you're capable of.

So where's yours then?

If you were interested in honest discussion you'd have already addressed the post in question instead of feeble deflection. Not the first time and won't be the last.

Pffft, hardly. I'm just pointing out the obvious irrationality in reading it literally is all. Hey, maybe you would ask for a drop of water for your tongue while at a friends house when thirsty or whatever...

You don't know them at all but you're the one judging them for not having the "initiative" to up sticks and move before the shelling started.

Of course He didn't. Yet you effectively do as per comparison with the plight of Ukrainians that you seem to glibly describe as their own fault.

Their "lust" for what exactly? To live as you and I do, in our own homes? Quite the pompous judge of these people aren't you?

Well, if you can't be bothered to scroll back a coupla pages or whatever to the pertinent points laid out then that just shows how interested you were in an honest discussion then. You sure seemed clear enough on the matter to accuse me of not being lucid on the issue.

Doesn't make them all Christians or joyous for doing it does it? They'd probably prefer they wouldn't be having to and that these refugees still had their own homes to live in. Sure, the charity is something to treasure but the need for it isn't.

Even with conventional weapons they've laid waste to untold numbers of civilian deaths and Putin knew that as did his regime. Sure, he could nuke Ukraine but as you say, that would be met with obvious reprisals and the West itself doesn't want to get too embroiled in the war where things could...

Oh please. What "geographical goals" would those be exactly? Was it part of the "special military operation" to have an entire convoy of armoured vehicles stuck and out of fuel? You reckon this was Putin's plan all along? To have a drawn out war that the entire sane media across the globe...

Then it wasn't really much of one when you argue about Russia exercising restraint. Of course they aren't. They're just failing in their objectives and for reasons outlined already.

Except the invasion was in full global view from the outset. So that doesn't fly.

Because that's what Russia does. It targets civilians under the pretense of it being a military target and has a history of doing it if you were to educate yourself on the score. I would ask where you get your "news" from for your latter but given your usual there's little point.

Yup. Now you're getting it and not just the state of disrepair of the equipment but the lack of training and resolve in personnel. Now, if you think Russia has such military might, how about you explain how after a month they've come nowhere near to subjugating Ukraine?