Search results

Exactly.

Five year old children aren't capable of committing capital crimes for obvious reasons outlined multiple times already. How are you seemingly incapable of grasping that?

Of course it makes a difference else why stop at five? Why not charge babies with crimes as well? Ridiculous? Sure, but then so's charging five year old kids with murder. The reasoning centers of the brain are no way developed for them to be capable of such an act. The law rightfully takes this...

Do you consider five year old children capable of murder?

You're not. Frankly, you're a coward who hasn't got the guts to answer a simple question. Pathetic.

Do you agree with JR or not? Why do you constantly shy away from answering one way or the other?

Clear enough that five year old children aren't accountable and no support for their being executed whatsoever. Am I to understand that you do lack the courage to answer a straightforward question regarding whether you agree with JR on the matter?

Ya know, at least Jefferson gave an honest (and sensible) answer on this. That where it came to unruly children in the Bible that it was referring to adults and not minors, infants etc. How come you can't even address as to whether you agree with JR that children as young as five can rightfully...

Then don't post in it.

Putin is an absolute despot. The odds are favourable that a replacement could hardly be any worse.

The Bible. Have read it ya know and there's nothing to support minors being put to death else you prove me wrong if you do agree with JR that children as young as five should be put to death if they've somehow committed a capital crime? Do you?

Considering I'm not a Marxist you're about as 'correct' as you are in general, which is to say not at all. But hey, you carry on with your ridiculous hyperbole and being an apologist for the despot if you want.

There's no support in the Bible for executing minors. So, do you agree with JR or not?

Nobody needs reminding of Russia's nuclear arsenal but all I'm saying is that if the most prominent dictator were to be out of office then it's unlikely that his 'successor' would be as vehement as him or as assured in destructive courses of action. It's not celebration day or anything by any...

Bring back Gorbachev frankly. However, sans Putin is still odds on rather than with him. I'm well aware that there are doubtless others who would take up a similar mantle but with far less experience in such a position and the disarray would be something at least. It would be a bet I'd take.

A five year old child can't commit such a crime whether male or female. The laws we have that reflect this fact are based on the obvious, such as cognitive development or at such a young age - the lack thereof. The laws we have are thankfully grounded in reason, common sense and not 'out there'...

There's a whole lot of people on 'the spectrum' so autism itself isn't the factor here. A whole new term needs to be invented for those who bought/buy into the likes of 'Q'.

A five year old can't commit a capital crime and the laws we have in place rightfully take age into account. That's why we have laws that protect children from the likes of what you advocate and why we have ones that rightfully prosecute an adult having sex with a ten year old for child rape...

This was "Q"'s whole MO. Dispense a whole load of pseudo cryptic rubbish that would appeal to those already gullible to buy into any given narrative that fitted their bias. Also designed to make those who followed it feel as if they were in on something that set them apart and ironically smarter...

Well, it would take some doing to have someone replacing Putin that could be worse so the odds favour the latter if there's any substance to this.