Search results

Yup, clear as day.

Not sure what you're getting at with that.

Who says I get "all worked up"?

I was referring to the poster "User Name" who I shortened to "UN". Poster names often get shortened to initials on here. They haven't to me, personally. They generally bemuse/amuse me in equal measure.

I already have. Tighter restrictions, background checks etc.

Oh, I know I'm correct on the former, I know a staffy when I see one. :) I agree with some of your latter and completely disagree with some of these laws as covered in the link below. There are exemptions as outlined but there should be more of an emphasis on owner responsibility than any...

The dog you have is a Staffordshire Bull Terrier. It clearly isn't a cross breed or "Pit Bull". Does that bother you? Cross breeds are not illegal including bull terriers in the mix but what you have is fully fledged 'Staffy'.

Well, I don't know which "Brits" you've been reading but your pic resembles a fully fledged Staffordshire Bull Terrier and that is the correct name of the breed. I should know, I was brought up with them when I was born, throughout childhood and beyond and we generally refer to them as "Staffys"...

Wow, such an edifying letter...

Told by who? Ignoramuses? I've owned the breed and they're no more an "assault canine" than any other breed of dog.

Except you didn't actually make one. You made a bunch of presumptions that didn't hold up is all but if you want to think I was wound up then eh, go right ahead. Kinda used to folk doing that stuff around these parts and you're bringing nothing new to the table in that regard.

It's still baffling how the far right on here are supporting or making apologies for a communist despot. Bizarre to say the least.

Frankly, Tom, you have no idea as to 'what I want' given this. I'm not for anything like you suggest. If you think I support the removal of all gun rights in America then you're wrong. Supporting tighter legislation and restrictions before ownership is not tantamount to that in any way. Why...

Well, was a cringe worthy trawl but listened to the whole thing months ago and there's no denying that Trump was feebly trying to coerce Raffensperger into "finding" him over 11,000 votes. That's fraud, plain and simple, much like the MAGA crowd.

Isn't that a prerequisite? Whatever, Trump getting equal time as he apparently wishes - bring it on!

Sometimes destructive behaviour can be blatantly apparent which I thought would have been equally obvious. So, in light of that I'm not saying red flag laws are pointless at all. I'm pointing out that people who commit suicide and have severe depression don't always advertise it in any sort of...

Yes.

Oh, okay, don't do better then. Shame though, you used to be a poster who I respected despite disagreement. Ho hum.

No, you don't which is frankly, patently obvious. It's far too easy for people to avail themselves of guns without stringent measures in place, verified background checks etc etc. Robb Elementary is the latest in a long line of massacres and you can't single out suicide as the prevailing factor...

What on earth makes you think that UN's feelings have been hurt?