Search results

You can yawn all ya like, it's a feeble scenario and badly composed. If you show little to no compassion to your fellow man then you aren't 'loving God' by association. Folk who snootily look down their noses at others don't fare very well in the Bible do they? You can repeat your 'hating...

Or rather, just plain sick.

An observation is hardly an ad hominem. It wasn't well thought out at all, simple as that and poorly worded also. The 'grabbing woman' part especially in either scenario. God's patience - and love - is not yours to limit. Lot's of verses can be used to suit positions but the spiel is on...

What, for getting one of their most prestigious military units destroyed?

Exactly, and it's not as though he doesn't have access to high ranking legal counsel. Some folk just refuse to see Trump for what he is and whatever he does it's somehow excusable and any action is tantamount to some sort of witch hunt...

Have you seen through the bat crazy 'Q' yet?

Well, whoever came up with it wasn't thinking too much. Love doesn't cast off forever and your "hating God" spiel is as predictable as it is nonsensical. People are not "hating God" for having different beliefs or doubts on the score as you. It might make it easier for you to judge people that...

No, it isn't and one can only presume you aren't a parent for even uttering such vile tripe. A loving parent wouldn't dream of saying as you have but a loveless legalist well might.

Do you read anything besides The Gateway Dumbwit?!

Erm, no it isn't, it's tragic. It's bad parenting to allow a child to go near a pool where they could potentially drown without supervision, regardless of whether you 'commanded' them to go near it or not. Wow, this is actually sick as all get out.

Agreed. Oh, hang on...

Repeating your usual mantra of soundbites doesn't make anything so either. If you're going to concoct some sort of analogy up then you really do need to come up with a better one but that's up to you. Love doesn't do anything as you say or imply. Out of curiosity, what is your definition or...

If you were correct - which you aren't - then there'd be no such thing as atheists/agnostics/those of different beliefs and yet there are. So no, they are not "willingly" choosing to 'live' in an eternity of separation. That is a ridiculous posit and one born of arrogance and also ignorance...

Agreed, but then I'm not the one doing that. No, they don't and it's equal parts arrogant and simplistic to even posit such a ridiculous notion. Your analogy falls apart all ends up also. If a man truly loves a woman then whether or not those feelings are reciprocated he wouldn't act like a...

Yeah, it was... Nothing was conceded as your gist backfired with your following as it interminably does with people who promote the doctrine like yourself. God won't force people to do anything but after a certain point He apparently will force them to be in a condition from which there's no...

You do realize that given the source, there's a high probability that it's just complete bunk, right?

Well, that's a terrible analogy in relation to the OP... The gist seems to be that love will not force, which is fair enough but that kinda falls apart when people in an eternal suffering paradigm are forced into a state with no escape from it whatever.

Well, might go against that particular grain but where it comes to the far right at any rate, I see more stupidity and gullibility than the nefarious overall.

Qanon followers are monumentally gullible, simple as that. If being blunt amounts to 'posturing' in your book then guilty as charged. In reality, nothing of the sort.

As UN has pointed out, how would you know? Russia sure hasn't abandoned it's stock piles of bio weapons so what on earth threat were the Ukraine posing? None is what and your reticence to flat out condemn the Russian despot's invasion of a sovereign nation is tacit support for it at the very least.