Search results

I would recommend taking your own advice along with recognizing reality. Until you do, you're in no position to criticize anyone else's faculties as much as you like to.

Proud, unloving, unmerciful, unforgiving, boasters, undiscerning etc. Sounds a lot like plenty of the legalist lot from back then and today. Regardless, the fact remains that Christians and homosexuals have the right to air their views in the public domain. To deny that is to deny reality.

Of course it's not false, it's reality. Your particular views about what homosexuals should face and what rights they shouldn't have are entirely irrelevant. You do understand that, right?

You made a claim that doesn't stand up. It's hardly the first time that Christians on the far right have pulled this stunt either, aCW regularly tried for some sort of martyr status on his bonkers WHMBR! thread(s). Reality doesn't bear that out. You have the right to air your views, as do they...

Your predictable, fundamentalist rhetoric notwithstanding, the point remains. Christians and homosexuals share the public square. You can air the likes of which you do here and so can they. You have the freedom to say they shouldn't and they have the freedom to disagree and air their own views...

Hardly, I have reality and common sense on my side. They aren't mutually exclusive by any stretch, not in the West at any rate and even evidenced with the freedom you have on forums such as this. You have the right to air your views as you see fit and send them into the public domain. So do...

To be fair, that is asking a lot...

Ironic, considering Trump was supposed to be fighting a secret war against a cabal of pedophiles... Obvious cobblers as with all of Q and as per usual, none too bright.

Reality shows otherwise to your premise. KGOV articles don't count.

What, she didn't know what AFPAC stood for or represented or those involved in it before agreeing to be elected a speaker? Convincing...

I didn't hang around long enough to find out although I'd be surprised if he was pro LGBT given the rhetoric he was coming out with. The point is that Christians (including conservative fundamentalist's) are allowed their say in the public square just as homosexuals are.

https://www.logically.ai/articles/is-russell-brand-pushing-the-ukraine-biolab-narrative

Trump will probably still deny knowing who Fuentes even is and praise his moustache or something...

Consistency around these parts nowadays? Well, bat crazy and trolling perhaps...

Sounds like some blokes still can't handle the fact that women are allowed to vote in essence.

Well, which one is that because only a few days ago there was a guy who was preaching on the local high street in my town and he was allowed to do so, and this was an evangelical - hellfire and brimstone etc. Wasn't carted off or arrested or the like. Was ignored by most really or treat with...

Pathetic isn't it?

A shame "Poso" doesn't as well...

Why would the FBI need to insert documents during a raid to make Trump look bad? This is a feeble soundbite headline even for TGP. He already looked bad (and that's nothing to do with his ridiculous fake tan either).

Is this another attempt at "humour" or something? Just asking cos clearly anna is as homophobic as any non wingnut. Doesn't make excuses for the despot Putin at all either. Tried to come up with a punchline for this but there's so nothing funny about this risible invasion by Putin's regime really.