Search results

As you are for genocide and I'm not it's objectively not projection. At least I'm not for genocide like you are.

Being worse than Trump makes you a saint... Are you sure you want to put Trump on that high a pedestal? At least I'm not for genocide like you.

Because opinions inform actions. :D:ROFLMAO::LOL:😅😂 You work hard to prove your above point, that's for sure!

You are more evil than Trump.

They are free to do it. But they know it's bad for them. Sure they may have a somewhat distorted view of the costs involved, but they aren't completely without a will.

Then you should have just said you are not qualified to have an opinion. However, for other readers, I'll give the answer (numbers from CDC for the US): Twenty-five percent or more of the excess deaths in 2020 were among the young and not from COVID. If you can't figure out why this means there...

The good news is that the vast majority of drugs sold are not used by the heavily addicted. So there would be a huge reduction in drug sales volume just by raising the lives of everyone in a population. Even still, the book I read focused on the heavy users. And the success rate of improved...

How virulent/hazardous does it need to be to fit the definition? Shouldn't you have included that part in your original definition?

That includes every flu season, twice a year, since... forever. So that's obviously not the definition of pandemic.

The proud boys as Trump's army to take over the government? That doesn't pass the smell test. Especially with gov't like FBI and Capitol police also trying to get people into the capital, the insurrection story has no foundation. Thus, to say Trump is responsible for an insurrection doesn't make...

If you say so.:unsure:

Since there was no pandemic by any rational definition, the vaccines could only do more harm than good.

I paid attention enough to the Russia collusion hoax. They said we'd find out soon enough on that too. As much as I hate Trump, he didn't do anything wrong in this case.

I used to take a hard line against drugs. Then I got a book on addiction that showed most people that try drugs stop on their own. Why? Because their crappy lives got better and drugs got in the way so they quit. Most people that tried drugs don't go on to the heavy-use dearth spiral that make...

The Russia collusion hoax was supposed to be explosive, too.

Yeah, but it will never get below 70%, I don't think.

Your explanation is weak because the distribution of marine fossils is too even. And on top of that you have anomalies like the nautiloids in the Grand Canyon and polystrate fossils with marine fossils in the Joggins formation. What elements are you talking about?

Actually sharing (transferring, selling, and other synonyms) an idea that is purchased is common. It's the norm in companies. No, they don't both have the right to the idea. The government decides who gets the idea. But people not only want to make things easier, they need to make things...

No, your premise is wrong. A license is a two way contract, and if the buyer doesn't agree to the contract it's up to the *seller* not to sell. And beyond that it's up to the seller to get *positive* agreement to the contract. In other words, if the seller doesn't get a kind of signature he has...

There it's nothing wrong with only sharing an idea if someone pays for it. But since ideas are not scarce in an economic sense someone else can have the same idea and then you won't be able to profit from it anymore. When this was argued before, someone said we'd never have the software we have...