Search results

The proverbial Freudian slip?

Well, doesn't get much more self serving and narcissistic than Trump so kinda befitting...

Then how many innocent lives would have been lost if those wrongfully convicted weren't allowed to appeal? Plenty is what. I'm going to break some of the rest of this down as it's getting parsed to bits. You acknowledge that a judge has right to counsel from peers and experts before making his...

The fact that it's controlled by Russian forces is cause for concern in itself...

Of course there is, there's wingnuts, racists and loons in the UK just like everywhere else. Nothing like the hyperbole that some on the far right propose though.

Good to hear on both counts. :)

I haven't been although I'm at college with three Ukrainian women who are refugees and it's humbling how they cope with such devastating war in their own country along with being uprooted as they have. Great post Pete and it puts the trolls and Putin apologists to absolute shame.

Actually I was saying that Trump and Desantis are just being their risible selves, you're the one who bought democrats into it but hey, plenty of corruption in all political parties and I've never made a secret of how cynical I am in regards to politics/politicians in general. If that's news to...

Don't seem to be trying to be anything other than their risible selves.

He's an embarrassment to his own country and even his own regime, many of whom want him out.

So, America should only intervene or take action if it involves a country where it can ply valuable resources from? Go watch some more Patrick Lancaster videos...

The irony of Trump accusing anyone of sexual misconduct is laughable but at the same time De Santis hasn't exactly denied it either...More unsavoury antics from the Republican brigade...

The judge was right to instruct you in such a manner as you're not in a position to determine absolute guilt. That's not your or any other juror's job unless it's an absolutely open and shut case in which case a jury is pretty superfluous anyway. There are cases where guilt/innocence has been...

I was talking about people convicted being allowed to appeal the decision, not the judge. A judge most certainly should have access to counsel and expert assistance where it comes to deciphering the evidence, logistics etc. But if it comes down to his ruling alone where it comes to...

Well, no point in arguing against that sort of delusion...

Well, if it "can't be refuted" then how come it ain't taken seriously, even among Republicans? It's a joke.

Sure it was. It was all above board and most voters by a more than significant margin wanted Hobbs in over Lake. Who are you to dismiss what most folk wanted?

And? Just shoot it down and hope it doesn't hit anybody anyway? At that altitude I don't see the problem with waiting for it to travel over the ocean before being taken down.

I've already explained this to you and responses to others in what were forthright and clear terms. What's tripping you up? I'm well aware that to secure a conviction doesn't require absolute proof of guilt but proof beyond reasonable doubt and I'm not talking about changing that. I'm talking...

If you have a system that doesn't allow any sort of appeals process upon conviction and one whereby a lone judge is the one to make a decision then the amount of wrongful decisions would increase, not decrease and that's in terms of both the innocent being convicted and the guilty allowed to go...