Search results

Yeah, very clever once again. No, but we do have the gospel according to Mark and the gospel according to Luke. That means we can have the gospel according to Peter, and the Gospel according to Paul. So how about the gospel of the circumcision and the gospel of the uncircumcision? I...

I'm going to be looking this one up myself. See ya later.

Hmmm.....I think it's because we are created IN Christ Jesus. He is the head of the body...yes, the church. This may be what you're saying, too, but it's late and I'm having a hard time following you on this one.

Very clever. Why doesn't number 1 apply? What about number 3? There is certainly a uniqueness between the circumcised and the uncut. Let's give it a test run. The good news can be good news today but bad news tomorrow. The good news can be concerning land and promises, or salvation unto...

My very words betray me? lol Yes, the subject is the gospel. The gospel (of, for, to) the circumcision, as preached by Peter, was that their Kingdom on earth was at hand. The gospel (of,for, to) the uncircumcision was that they could be saved apart from Israel through grace. I included...

I love this. Acts 10:34 Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons: 35 But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him. Peter had the sheet experience, and this must have been hard for him. It...

You skipped the verse below it. You refused to even acknowledge it. Which shows you will stop at almost nothing to prove some point that is wrong. Whether you have to use another translation or ignore the verse that explains what you post. Try the front door. It always works so much...

Your comment in red has destroyed whatever point you were trying to make. Trying to slip through the back door is not an exactly an honest way to discuss scripture.

Are you a Greek scholar? No, I didn't think so. You're hoping to change the meaning of the verse when it is very clear the subject is the gospel. Galatians 2:7 Greek Study Bible (Apostolic / Interlinear) ἀλλὰ τουναντίον ἰδόντες ὅτι πεπίστευμαι τὸ εὐαγγέλιον τῆς ἀκροβυστίας καθὼς Πέτρος...

Maybe instead of using some off the wall translation, you should first stop reading into verses things that are not there. Paul is talking about letting God's work in you come out where others can see it. As long as you think anything we do contributes to our salvation, you will continue to...

No, as opposed to "this Bible says this ,and this other one says that. and we have no real truth because all these darn Bibles contradict each other.

You people need to get yourselves a Bible that doesn't pervert the word of God. Galatians 2:7 But contrariwise, when they saw that the gospel of the uncircumcision was committed unto me, as the gospel of the circumcision was unto Peter;

Oh boy. A trick question. A hidden message. A deep thought. I love those. We have the gospel of the circumcision or the gospel to the circumcision. We also have the gospel of the uncircumcision or the gospel to the uncircumscision. Think hard everyone. Did we see how it suddenly...

I love all this translation searching. Keep looking until you find something you think might be saying something isn't.

What you haven't shown is both of them preaching both gospels. That's what I'm waiting for.

Trump Derangement Syndrome is a very dangerous disease. It causes people to show themselves to be fools as they continue to grasp for straws hoping they'll keep them from sinking into the pit of despair. So sad.

This is like the forces of good and evil! o_O

Hindsight is the best, isn't it? John 12:14-16 And Jesus, when he had found a young ass, sat thereon; as it is written, Fear not, daughter of Sion: behold, thy King cometh, sitting on an ass's colt. 16 These things understood not his disciples at the first: but when Jesus was glorified...

Both? I thought you said there was only one.

You're just mad because it wasn't lost.....you just missed it.