Search results

Thank you for this. I know we're often poles apart on certain stuff but you don't delve into the kind of childish snot that some do around here.

Because both the actor and the character he portrays have links to the same outfit. Not to mention that there is a lot of criticism from anti traffickers for all sorts of discrepancies and inaccuracies within the film. It's doubtless one of the talking points of late but it's not a film to take...

Oh, well that clears everything up then!

Well, that's one of the more bonkers memes out there...especially 'out there' in fact...

Oh, so no actual answer then. Okay.

Well, what rights would anyone have under your "ideal" system?

"Threads" is taking over!

Would women have equal rights to men under your "Biblical constitutional monarchist" system?

Except it's not an act. He promotes asinine conspiracy rubbish.

He's an advocate for Qanon. Nuff said.

If you're familiar with nuance then you'll understand how one can be completely against child trafficking and a movie saturated with propaganda. If you're not familiar with nuance then okay, you're not gonna connect the dots so easily...

Well, pretty much everything. Just lame as anything also... Was a straightforward question Jefferson. Do you have anything against women having equal rights? Ya know, those that were denied them in the patriarchal past such as the vote etc.

Once again, no.

Strange meme but hey ho... Do you have anything against women having equal rights?

The only dishonest one between both of us is actually both of us RD, because everyone is dishonest on occasion including both me and yourself. I have not been dishonest on this particular however and have thoroughly shown you as to why your accusations hold no merit. I've highlighted your...

Well, you might have read it but you either still don't recognize your error or are just being blatantly dishonest about it. There's no other explanation for your antics on this. There's sure no "backtracking" going on. Had I flat out stated that any given article from gutter tabloid/wingnut...

No.

Quite possibly but few would be so publicly acquainted with absolute loony tune stuff like Qanon.

If only you did, that would be great! However, you don't. Your accusation is entirely without merit as established here: TGP is a wingnut source for absolute sure but I've already explained to you that even then it doesn't automatically make any given article they print false by association...

Well, no, it wasn't. You are rather a strange person to me. You make accusations that don't hold up and then double down on them but in fairness you're hardly the only one, especially on here.