Search results

I believe the Course has the right balance between positive (cataphatic) theology and negative (apophatic) theology. It also has the right balance between theology and psychology. I find it to be illuminating, not confusing. But if confuses you, then don't read it. It's not your path. The...

Which one is it? Too much, or not enough? Previously, you were complaining that the Course did not provide enough to satisfy your rational mind. We will have to agree to disagree. This is not true. It does not deny the experience of guilt. It acknowledges the problem and addresses it. The...

The Course is not merely theoretical; it is also pragmatic.

But it doesn't appear to offer enough metaphysical speculation to satisfy your "rational mind." That's your opinion. I obviously do not share it. The UB holds little attraction for me. It appears to have limited spiritual value.

The goal of the Course is spiritual enlightenment, not metaphysical speculation. (Anything else would be deemed a distraction.) That's why I stated previously that the Course basically appeals to those who are on the mystical quest.