Search results

  1. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    Jesus Christ is my foundation as a faithful witness as other faithful witnesses are of the OT and NT . “For we are God’s coworkers. You are God’s field, God’s building. According to God’s grace that was given to me, I have laid a foundation as a skilled master builder, and another builds on it...
  2. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    Nontrinitarianism is a tradition of men, and the Trinity is the Sacred Tradition of the Apostles . That’s a false dichotomy as no faithful witness in the Old Testament or New used that anachronistic post biblical prerequisite as a reference as it wasn’t invented till later . Old Testament...
  3. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    Name calling by Jesus Christ ? “Therefore, laying aside all malice, all deceit, hypocrisy, envy, and all evil speaking, For to this you were called, because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that you should follow His steps: “Who committed no sin, Nor was deceit found in His...
  4. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    By the way Jesus Christ never used the NT it was written after the fact under the inspiration of God not men .
  5. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    Jesus Christ was faithful to his beliefs not yours 5:17,18 m Luke 24:44.
  6. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    I understand how messianic prophecy doesn’t fit your anachronistic post biblical prerequisite. “I have many things to say and to judge of you: but he that sent me is true; and I speak to the world those things which I have heard of him. They understood not that he spake to them of the Father...
  7. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    Actually no scripture denies Jesus Christ came in the flesh hence . So I’m not sure where my words ever suggested what you accuse me of ?
  8. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    Jesus Christ was never a practicing Christian as he was born under the law and died under it according to the scripture . Does that make him the Antichrist ?
  9. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    I use any bible translation. I love this scripture. “For though I am free from all men, I have made myself a slave to all, that I might win the more. To the Jews I became as a Jew, in order to win Jews; to those under the law I became as one under the law—though not being myself under the...
  10. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    “When I spoke to you and when I taught you God's message, I did not use clever words. I did not want you to believe me because you thought I was wise. Instead, it was the power of God's Holy Spirit that showed you that my message was true. As a result, you now believe because of God's power. You...
  11. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    I’m not sure you understand the concept of Christ( one who is chosen or anointed by God ) your ad hominem attack haven’t changed the valid points I made . we can agree to disagree . peace .
  12. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    I didn’t men to upset you 2 Timothy 2:15 , 3:16,17 .
  13. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    I do like Paul ““But I admit that I follow the Way, which they call a cult. I worship the God of our ancestors, and I firmly believe the Jewish law and everything written in the prophets.” ‭‭Acts of the Apostles‬ ‭24:14‬ ‭NLT‬‬ https://www.bible.com/bible/116/act.24.14.nlt
  14. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    Actually Paul who is a follower of Christ would of not used Plotinus ( neoplatonist) concept of Godhead , Colossians .
  15. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    Thanks you , Im not trying to upset people .
  16. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    If you need to put words into Jesus mouth so scripture can agree with your man made theology I feel sad 😞 . Jesus never required your false assertion or dichotomy to put him in a box . Ambiguous verses that need a anachronistic prerequisite makes me wonder how Jesus Christ preach truth . Oh yeah...
  17. f.y.i

    The biblical Jesus Christ wasn’t a post biblical prerequisite to philosophical premises.

    Jesus Christ wasn’t God Almighty or did he need to be according to the law of Moses . “The one who comes from above is above all. The one who is from the earth is earthly and speaks in earthly terms. The one who comes from heaven is above all. He testifies to what he has seen and heard, and...
Top