• This is a new section being rolled out to attract people interested in exploring the origins of the universe and the earth from a biblical perspective. Debate is encouraged and opposing viewpoints are welcome to post but certain rules must be followed. 1. No abusive tagging - if abusive tags are found - they will be deleted and disabled by the Admin team 2. No calling the biblical accounts a fable - fairy tale ect. This is a Christian site, so members that participate here must be respectful in their disagreement.

Viruses are manufactured

Avajs

Active member
Your answer would be the brain but the argument I've already presented proves that there's more to it. You ignoring the argument doesn't count as a rebuttal. Do you claim to base your life on reason or don't you, Avajs? If so, then on what basis do you ignore rational arguments that pertain specifically to the issues you are trying to argue?

The answer is that you do not base your life on reason but only pretend to do so.
What more than the chemistry and physics going on in your brain allows for you to think logically. Evidence please.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
Well, thanks, have a nice life. Spend your time calling someone else a liar.
I'm spending my life right now calling you a liar! The worst kind of liar! The naive that lies to himself!

Ignore the evidence all around you that your belief system is based on nothing.
You're not just a liar, you're a hypocrite. Throughout our entire exchange, which is all still right here for the entire world to read, I have been the one presenting actual arguments that are 100% rationally sound while you make baseless claim after baseless claim and in so doing become the very thing you claim to hate.

You do not have the courage to look at the real world but hide in the unseen.
This entire thread, and every post I've made on it, is direct proof to the contrary - and you know it! I pity you.
 

Avajs

Active member
I'm spending my life right now calling you a liar! The worst kind of liar! The naive that lies to himself!


You're not just a liar, you're a hypocrite. Throughout our entire exchange, which is all still right here for the entire world to read, I have been the one presenting actual arguments that are 100% rationally sound while you make baseless claim after baseless claim and in so doing become the very thing you claim to hate.


This entire thread, and every post I've made on it, is direct proof to the contrary - and you know it! I pity you.
Keep your pity and your inability to answer the question of what, other than chemistry and physics in your brain, allows you to reason? If you presented evidence before I missed it so just do it again.
 

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
what, other than chemistry and physics in your brain, allows you to reason?

Chemistry and physics doesn't allow you to reason.

In other words, your question is a loaded question. Answering it the way you want it answered concedes the very premise that Clete has already undermined.

No one is saying that your brain doesn't do stuff when you think.

But to assume that the stuff that happens in one's brain is the very act of thinking itself is not only begging the question, but is likely the result of confirmation bias.

What Clete is asking you, that you are avoiding answering like it's the Plague, is far more fundamental to the discussion. To use a building analogy: You're trying to defend against Clete from the 21st floor, while Clete is deep underground using TNT on the foundation.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
Keep your pity and your inability to answer the question of what, other than chemistry and physics in your brain, allows you to reason?
I did answer it! What are you even talking about? I've proven that you cannot even ask the question without presupposing that MY worldview is true! The very fact that you are here is PROOF that you are wrong!

Further, reason is not just another biological function, like digestion or respiration. Digestion and respiration are purely physical processes, while reasoning involves meaning, logic, and truth. These cannot be reduced to chemistry or physics. If truth exists, it must be grounded in something beyond nature.

The consequences of this argument are clear. Naturalism cannot explain reason. Any attempt to do so either undermines itself or reduces thought to a meaningless byproduct of physics. However, reason does exist, and we rely on it every day. The only explanation that makes sense is that reason comes from something beyond nature, something rational, something personal, something that can be described as God.

If you presented evidence before I missed it so just do it again.
You didn't miss it! You cannot have missed it. You may not have understood it or you may have ignored it, but that isn't the same thing.
 

Clete

Truth Smacker
Silver Subscriber
THE LAWS OF LOGIC.

THE LAWS OF LOGIC.

Please demonstrate where we can find those in the material world.
I really don't think he understands the argument.

I recall when Hilston first introduced me to the TAG. I didn't get it for the longest time! If felt contradictory to me at first. Then one day, the light came on and now I can't understand how I didn't see it from the beginning.

Both the TAG and Lewis' argument are of a kind, I think, and I'm sort of holding out hope that the light might still come on for Avajs.
 

Right Divider

Body part
I really don't think he understands the argument.
I think that he remains willfully ignorant.
I recall when Hilston first introduced me to the TAG. I didn't get it for the longest time! If felt contradictory to me at first. Then one day, the light came on and now I can't understand how I didn't see it from the beginning.

Both the TAG and Lewis' argument are of a kind, I think, and I'm sort of holding out hope that the light might still come on for Avajs.
Sorry, what is "the TAG"?
 
Last edited:

JudgeRightly

裁判官が正しく判断する
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Gold Subscriber
I really don't think he understands the argument.

I recall when Hilston first introduced me to the TAG. I didn't get it for the longest time! If felt contradictory to me at first. Then one day, the light came on and now I can't understand how I didn't see it from the beginning.

Both the TAG and Lewis' argument are of a kind, I think, and I'm sort of holding out hope that the light might still come on for Avajs.

Where there's life, there's hope.
 
Top