Why was Paul a prisoner?
Acts 23:
Then Paul, knowing that some of them were Sadducees and the others Pharisees, called out in the Sanhedrin, “My brothers, I am a Pharisee, descended from Pharisees. I stand on trial because of the hope of the resurrection of the dead.” 7 When he said this, a dispute broke out between the Pharisees and the Sadducees, and the assembly was divided. 8 (The Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, and that there are neither angels nor spirits, but the Pharisees believe all these things.
Nothing there about a change in the Law or abolishing of the OT.
Nothing there at all except preaching about One resurrected and the hope there is in that.
Oh sure lying jews wished to stir the people up against Paul and accuse that he taught against the Law and its Temple changing the customs of Moses but just like with Stephen who Paul witnessed stoned to death these accusations were FALSE.
Paul states again in front of Felix what the ONE charge against him is:
Acts 24:19
“But there are some Jews from the province of Asia, who ought to be here before you and bring charges if they have anything against me. 20 Or these who are here should state what crime they found in me when I stood before the Sanhedrin— 21 unless it was this one thing I shouted as I stood in their presence: ‘It is concerning the resurrection of the dead that I am on trial before you today.’”
Again NOTHING there about Paul teaching the Law was abolished or changed...those were false charges and no witnesses were found to confirm them.
And again:
Acts 25:
When Paul came in, the Jews who had come down from Jerusalem stood around him. They brought many serious charges against him, but they could not prove them.
8 Then Paul made his defense: “I have done nothing wrong against the Jewish law or against the temple or against Caesar.”
If Paul taught the Law was changed abrogated and their customs altered he could NOT have claimed his innocence.
What was that the ONE charge that stuck?
Certainly NOT that he taught the law and customs of Moses were changed...if that was the case it would have been proven.
And yet Christendom has stumbled ever after these jewish FALSE accusations.
Paul merely preached that One named Yahushua was resurrected...and the hope there in....
HalleluYah
Acts 23:
Then Paul, knowing that some of them were Sadducees and the others Pharisees, called out in the Sanhedrin, “My brothers, I am a Pharisee, descended from Pharisees. I stand on trial because of the hope of the resurrection of the dead.” 7 When he said this, a dispute broke out between the Pharisees and the Sadducees, and the assembly was divided. 8 (The Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, and that there are neither angels nor spirits, but the Pharisees believe all these things.
Nothing there about a change in the Law or abolishing of the OT.
Nothing there at all except preaching about One resurrected and the hope there is in that.
Oh sure lying jews wished to stir the people up against Paul and accuse that he taught against the Law and its Temple changing the customs of Moses but just like with Stephen who Paul witnessed stoned to death these accusations were FALSE.
Paul states again in front of Felix what the ONE charge against him is:
Acts 24:19
“But there are some Jews from the province of Asia, who ought to be here before you and bring charges if they have anything against me. 20 Or these who are here should state what crime they found in me when I stood before the Sanhedrin— 21 unless it was this one thing I shouted as I stood in their presence: ‘It is concerning the resurrection of the dead that I am on trial before you today.’”
Again NOTHING there about Paul teaching the Law was abolished or changed...those were false charges and no witnesses were found to confirm them.
And again:
Acts 25:
When Paul came in, the Jews who had come down from Jerusalem stood around him. They brought many serious charges against him, but they could not prove them.
8 Then Paul made his defense: “I have done nothing wrong against the Jewish law or against the temple or against Caesar.”
If Paul taught the Law was changed abrogated and their customs altered he could NOT have claimed his innocence.
What was that the ONE charge that stuck?
Certainly NOT that he taught the law and customs of Moses were changed...if that was the case it would have been proven.
And yet Christendom has stumbled ever after these jewish FALSE accusations.
Paul merely preached that One named Yahushua was resurrected...and the hope there in....
HalleluYah
Last edited: