Why Homosexuality MUST Be Recriminalized! Part 4

Status
Not open for further replies.

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
While I anxiously await shagster01's response to my latest post
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4452974&postcount=99

in another thread (and his invitation to bring the debate over here), I'll respond to some other posts.


Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Something makes me think that a self proclaimed Libertarian can't even define what Libertarianism is:

When you're able to define what Libertarianism is (without using subjective words like "liberty and freedom") then we'll talk.


Libertarianism is a political philosophy that seeks to maximize personal liberty.

There you go using one of the subjective words again (a word that has different meanings to different people)

It means that individuals should be left alone provided what they are doing is not harming others.

Your mission, should you choooooose to accept it, is to show that no harm has come to others since the decriminalization of homosexuality. (Libertarians believe that it's ok to kill oneself, going against Jesus's 2nd greatest commandment "Love thy neighbor as you'd love yourself").

mission-impossible-5.jpg


Our government worked like this for the most part from 1776-1930 with a few exceptions such as the 1910s.

I remember reading about those years, the years that homosexuality was a felony in every US State.

(So much for "liberty" and "freedom" for those who engaged in same-sex behavior).
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Here's a riddle for you Art:

What do you call a male and female's relationship that are living an immoral lifestyle by cohabitating together but decide to get married?

"A moral relationship".

What do you call two same sex perverts who are living together and decide to get married?

"Two same sex perverts."

An immoral relationship can be rectified through marriage, but a perversion is always a perversion.

Nope, this will just not do.

(Darn, and I try so hard to seek Art Brain's approval :( ).

I asked you to campaign against heterosexual cohabitation with the same vigour and vitriol you do with homosexuality.

That means long, tedious spiel. Propaganda from nutcase blogs, misinformation from ludicrous sites, laborious cut 'n' pastes and unfunny dialogue etc etc.

Now get on with it and make an effort this time.

(dear oh dear)

:nono:

(Art was acting somewhat manly until he said "dear oh dear").

Can I get started on your new smokescreen project after I tell about HRC founder and accused pederast Terry Bean buying off his underage accuser for $200,000, or must I start the new topic this very instant?
 

shagster01

New member
Since this now 4 part thread has existed, numerous authors (Fischer, Barber, etc.) have shown that the sexual anarchist/LGBTQueer movement cannot "coexist" with people of faith (those who embrace Judeo-Christian values). I challenge secular humanists regularly to show me how the two can without one side giving up their religious rights or the benefits that go with the decriminalization of homosexuality and abortion.

I'm currently attempting in another thread to get a devout hater of God and everything decent (shagster01, aka the Doper) to show me how the two sides (right v wrong, good v evil) can "coexist", but he hasn't been able to do so.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4452922&postcount=95

I'm moving that debate over here as it will go to blind eyes in the thread that will die out in a day or two.

Ok shag, show me that coexistence can happen without the *.

coexist1.jpg

This will be short discussion that has nothing to do with homosexuality being recriminalized, but everything you need to know is right here....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yin_and_yang
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Since this now 4 part thread has existed, numerous authors (Fischer, Barber, etc.) have shown that the sexual anarchist/LGBTQueer movement cannot "coexist" with people of faith (those who embrace Judeo-Christian values). I challenge secular humanists regularly to show me how the two can without one side giving up their religious rights or the benefits that go with the decriminalization of homosexuality and abortion.

I'm currently attempting in another thread to get a devout hater of God and everything decent (shagster01, aka the Doper) to show me how the two sides (right v wrong, good v evil) can "coexist", but he hasn't been able to do so.

http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=4452922&postcount=95

I'm moving that debate over here as it will go to blind eyes in the thread that will die out in a day or two.

Ok shag, show me that coexistence can happen without the *.


This will be short discussion that has nothing to do with homosexuality being recriminalized,...

It has everything to do with the recriminalization of homosexuality, as the loss of religious freedom (and the penalties that are given to people who refuse to give into the jack booted thug LGBTQueer agenda) is only one of the things that we're seeing since the decriminalization of homosexuality (indoctrination of youth, lack of parental rights, disease amongst homosexuals running rampant, etc. etc. etc. being others).


but everything you need to know is right here....

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yin_and_yang

So explain how the yin and yang can be applied to the LGBTQueer movement and giving up supposed "rights" that they've been given by a secular humanist government since homosexuality was decriminalized.
 

shagster01

New member
I say...

This will be short discussion that has nothing to do with homosexuality being recriminalized but...

Then acw says...

It has everything to do with the recriminalization of homosexuality

And then asks me to tell him how...

So explain how the yin and yang can be applied to the LGBTQueer movement and giving up supposed "rights" that they've been given by a secular humanist government since homosexuality was decriminalized.

Why would I explain his stance on this?

You been hitting the bong again acw?
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
Like CNN's proud and unrepentant homosexuals Donnie Lemon and Andy Cooper (see the index under "people profiles" to find out more about Donnie and Andy), Shepard Smith is biased when it comes to the subject of homosexuality because he engages in that behavior.

How is that any different from simply claiming that heterosexuals are all biased against homosexuals because they proudly indulge in heterosexual behaviour? Fact is you are simply making it up because you hate homosexuals, not that Smith actually is biased and your bias simply won't tolerate him doing anything.

If you can find anything that proud and unrepentant homosexuals Don Lemon, Anderson Cooper and Shepard Smith have reported that would paint homosexuality and/or the LGBQueer movement in a negative light, I would love to see it.

Don't spend too much time looking Al, as I guarantee you that you'll find nothing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
As Peter LaBarbera and Cliff Kincaid pointed out in the above video: When it comes to the truth, there is no need to be fair and balanced about it. The truth is the truth, period.

Yeah but the truth isn't true just because Porno Pete says it is, in fact it's more likely to be the opposite imo.

You and the LGBTQueer movement are so intimidated by the truth that Peter LaBarbera tells that you have to give him a filthy nickname.


Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
One would think that if you truly loved women you wouldn't put 29 million of them to death in a 43 year period or have the mothers of those little angels go through the pain, agony and grief that comes with aborting her own flesh and blood.

Again, how is that anything to do with misogyny, a hatred of women?

I'm just pointing out who the real misogynists are, and they're certainly not Christians who are taught to honor and respect women, not to treat them like a cheap piece of meat like secular humanists do (pornography, prostitution, abortion).


Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
And the opposite of hatred is love. When you love someone you do what's best for them.

Oh yes I've often noticed how you simply oose with love and kindness to all aCW.

(It's my...."method" that turns Al away, not the message).


Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
If you want to get more specific on the subject of misogyny, we could talk about the misogynists in the LGBTQueer movement and why they hate women so much.

Clearly like Porno Pete, I'm sure you must have had first hand experience including many years of trawling the net for anything LGBT,

Way too many, I don't know how Peter LaBarbera does it as it's such a depressing topic: child molestation and indoctrination, disease, misery, death.

but personally I don't sense any particular hatred for women from presumably gay men, often quite the opposite imo.

Dressing up like a woman doesn't mean that you honor and respect them Al.

c31aefb6-58b7-11e5-bff0-023220214d7f


However I do rather sense considerably more misogyny coming from right wing homophobic bigots.

Being that the cry of "woman hater!/misogynist!" will be heard constantly from the left with Queen Hilary wanting to be our next dictator, perhaps you could provide some examples on how us right wing homophobic bigots hate women?

Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
I'm pretty much convinced that because so many of them were overly mothered, they have a issue with woman all together.

MOTHERS AND SONS

So what? NARTH at least found what it wanted to find here apparently.
Some more effeminate men were overprotected by their mothers, big deal, but there's nothing here to suggest that such mothers create gay men or that gay men all hate their mothers/women.
So, some mothers are overprotective and perhaps do burden their already gay offspring with even more problems than just having to deal with your everyday homophobic bigots.

While you would still like to believe that the "Just Happens gene" is responsible for homosexual desires, I'm pointing out (again) that environmental factors are responsible, in this case women who over mothered their sons so much that it caused them to have sexual desires towards other males.

A prime example would be Vicky Gene Robison: His parents wanted a girl so bad that they gave him a girl's name, dressed him in girl's clothing, and guess what they got?

2014052356.jpg


...Why not try to become somewhat tolerant and understanding of any such differences instead of simply being part of other people's problems?
Where is your love aCW?

Speaking of tolerance: Since shagster01 isn't able to show that the LGBTQueer movement and people of faith can "coexist", perhaps you can take another shot at it? (you've tried before and failed miserably Al, give it another try).
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
I say...


Quote:
Originally Posted by shagster01
This will be short discussion that has nothing to do with homosexuality being recriminalized but...

Then acw says...


Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
It has everything to do with the recriminalization of homosexuality

And then asks me to tell him how...


Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
So explain how the yin and yang can be applied to the LGBTQueer movement and giving up supposed "rights" that they've been given by a secular humanist government since homosexuality was decriminalized.

Why would I explain his stance on this?

I just want to know how people of faith and cross dressers, bull dykes and fairies can "coexist", surely you can explain it with your ying and yang link.

Speaking of cross dressers (transvestites, drag queens), are you in a cross dressing band? I ask because you take quite an interest in defending transvestitism.

Lipstic%20Con.jpg


You been hitting the bong again acw?

There's more than enough one brain cell wonders in this world doper, I don't need to be one of them.
 

alwight

New member
While you would still like to believe that the "Just Happens gene" is responsible for homosexual desires, I'm pointing out (again) that environmental factors are responsible, in this case women who over mothered their sons so much that it caused them to have sexual desires towards other males.
And you would still like to believe that human sexual preference is a matter of choice. :rolleyes:
I will happily accept your word for it that you personally are able to choose but not me, I can't do that, and typically that's what homosexuals will say too.
For no apparently good reason you are compelled to conclude that despite what they themselves will tell you that gays are for some reason all lying.
You have idiotically concluded that gays all lie about something that in many cases can bring them close to suicide or that they participate in gay sexual activities and have same sex relationships simply to be perverse.
Why; just so you can excuse your own mindless homophobic bigotry and needless persecution of people who actually can't help what they just happen to be.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
While you would still like to believe that the "Just Happens gene" is responsible for homosexual desires, I'm pointing out (again) that environmental factors are responsible, in this case women who over mothered their sons so much that it caused them to have sexual desires towards other males.


And you would still like to believe that human sexual preference is a matter of choice. :rolleyes:
I will happily accept your word for it that you personally are able to choose but not me, I can't do that, and typically that's what homosexuals will say too.

All that people have to do is to listen to what those who engage in homosexual behavior say:

WARNING! Foul and disturbing language.



This and so many other testimonies can be found on page 1's index under "Causes".

I see that I'm almost 40 pages into the thread already; tis time to update the table of contents and get onto the segment on...

Education.
 

shagster01

New member
I just want to know how people of faith and cross dressers, bull dykes and fairies can "coexist", surely you can explain it with your ying and yang link.

Speaking of cross dressers (transvestites, drag queens), are you in a cross dressing band? I ask because you take quite an interest in defending transvestitism.

Lipstic%20Con.jpg




There's more than enough one brain cell wonders in this world doper, I don't need to be one of them.

Look around. Coexistence is currently happening...
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Look around. Coexistence is currently happening...

With Christians and those who simply stand for decency losing their jobs and businesses, being heavily fined and going to jail for standing up for God's Word (not to mention the endless death threats that they receive), I guess I missed where you secular humanists and people who stand for decency are "coexisting".

Back to your Ying and Yang article:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yin_and_yang

I see where martial arts is mentioned in the article. While two people that are often times fighting to the death is a far cry from "coexisting", I do see where the intolerant jack booted thugs of the LGBTQueer movement does energize me to be more active in this culture war.

Am I catching onto your Ying and Yang metaphor shag?
 

shagster01

New member
With Christians and those who simply stand for decency losing their jobs and businesses, being heavily fined and going to jail for standing up for God's Word (not to mention the endless death threats that they receive), I guess I missed where you secular humanists and people who stand for decency are "coexisting".

Back to your Ying and Yang article:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yin_and_yang

I see where martial arts is mentioned in the article. While two people that are often times fighting to the death is a far cry from "coexisting", I do see where the intolerant jack booted thugs of the LGBTQueer movement does energize me to be more active in this culture war.

Am I catching onto your Ying and Yang metaphor shag?

So by "coexist" you mean a utopian heaven on earth? Because I don't see a handful of people losing their job as a sign that things are not working overall unless that is what you mean.

Yes, this world is not 100% perfect. It wasn't even that way when 100% of the population were believers (Adam and Eve). Are you trying to prove to God that heaven is useless by making earth better?

You seem willing to coexist only as long as everything is your way.
 
Last edited:

TracerBullet

New member
With Christians and those who simply stand for decency losing their jobs and businesses, being heavily fined and going to jail for standing up for God's Word

Where exactly does Jesus command that Christians to hate their neighbor?



(not to mention the endless death threats that they receive),
Yeah right.




I guess I missed where you secular humanists and people who stand for decency are "coexisting".
You can't peacefully co-exists when you continually lie about a minority
 

alwight

New member
And you would still like to believe that human sexual preference is a matter of choice.:rolleyes:
I will happily accept your word for it that you personally are able to choose but not me, I can't do that, and typically that's what homosexuals will say too.
All that people have to do is to listen to what those who engage in homosexual behavior say:
Except that you have very selective hearing aCW, you only hear what you want to hear.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
With Christians and those who simply stand for decency losing their jobs and businesses, being heavily fined and going to jail for standing up for God's Word (not to mention the endless death threats that they receive), I guess I missed where you secular humanists and people who stand for decency are "coexisting".

So by "coexist" you mean a utopian heaven on earth?

Good and evil, right and wrong, decency and perversion can't "coexist", if you think that they can, show me how.

Because I don't see a handful of people losing their job as a sign that things are not working overall unless that is what you mean.

There's quite a bit more to this thread than what you refer to as "a handful of people" (there's many many more than a handful who are victims of the LGBTQueer "gaystapo") who stand for decency losing their jobs, being fined or incarcerated for standing up for God's Word. Amongst other things parents are losing their rights to seek therapy for their sexually or gender confused children.; children are being indoctrinated to accept sexual perversion as something normal; institutions are being changed to accommodate sexual deviants, etc. etc. etc.

Yes, this world is not 100% perfect. It wasn't even that way when 100% of the population were believers (Adam and Eve). Are you trying to prove to God that heaven is useless by making earth better?

There has always been sin and always will be, but that doesn't mean that God doesn't have a plan to deal with evil here on earth (by specifying what the role of civil government is).

You seem willing to coexist only as long as everything is your way.

Again, good and evil, right and wrong, decency and sexual perversion cannot "coexist". Why don't those of you who are currently winning this culture war admit it?
 

shagster01

New member
Quote:
Originally Posted by aCultureWarrior
With Christians and those who simply stand for decency losing their jobs and businesses, being heavily fined and going to jail for standing up for God's Word (not to mention the endless death threats that they receive), I guess I missed where you secular humanists and people who stand for decency are "coexisting".



Good and evil, right and wrong, decency and perversion can't "coexist", if you think that they can, show me how.



There's quite a bit more to this thread than a handful of people who stand for decency losing their jobs, being fined or incarcerated for standing up for God's Word. Amongst other things parents are losing their rights to seek therapy for their sexually or gender confused children.; children are being indoctrinated to accept sexual perversion as something normal; institutions are being changed to accommodate sexual deviants, etc. etc. etc.



There has always been sin and always will be, but that doesn't mean that God doesn't have a plan to deal with evil here on earth (by specifying what the role of civil government is).



Again, good and evil, right and wrong, decency and sexual perversion cannot "coexist". Why don't those of you who are currently winning this culture war admit it?

You keep saying "good and evil, right and wrong" like they are the same thing. I just had this discussion on another thread. Those aren't necessarily synonyms. Until you learn that, you will remain imprisoned to a false idea.
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
You keep saying "good and evil, right and wrong" like they are the same thing. I just had this discussion on another thread. Those aren't necessarily synonyms. Until you learn that, you will remain imprisoned to a false idea.

I'll make it simpler then:

Can the LGBTQueer/sexual anarchist movement and Christianity coexist?

If so, how?
 

aCultureWarrior

BANNED
Banned
LIFETIME MEMBER
For those of you that have been following this now 4 part thread, you know that the founder of the most powerful homosexual organization in the world (the Human Rights Campaign) was arrested for having sex with an underage boy.

I speculated that because of his political influence, HRC founder and accused pederast Terry Bean would find a way to beat the charges.

terry-bean-and-obama.jpg


Once again I was right.


$200,000 offer ends 'gay' Democrat's child-sex charges

Judge: 'Mr. Bean, you are free to go'

Sept.2 , 2015

Democratic Party fundraiser and gay activist Terry Bean made sex-abuse allegations with a 17-year-old boy [who was 15 at the time when sexual relations between he and Bean occurred] disappear on Tuesday thanks to a $200,000 settlement offer.


Terry Bean, 67, faced child sexual-abuse charges over a September 2013 incident that allegedly occurred at a Eugene, Oregon, hotel with his ex-boyfriend, 25-year-old Kiah Lawson, and the teenager. Lane County Circuit Judge Jay McAlpin dismissed the case when Lane County Chief Deputy District Attorney Erik Hasselman said the teenager declined to testify, the Register Guard reported Wednesday.

“Mr. Bean, you are free to go,” the judge said, the newspaper reported.

Bean released a statement after the decision, saying “I have been silent for almost a year on the advice of my attorney, but while I am relieved that the charges against me have been dropped, this nightmare never should have even begun,” the Oregonian reported Tuesday. “I take some measure of comfort that the world now knows what I have always known – that I was falsely accused and completely innocent of every accusation that was made.”

The Deputy District Attorney Hasselman said that while the young man refused to testify, he maintains he was the victim of third-degree sexual abuse and third-degree sodomy, the Register Guard reported.

Hasselman said he is convinced that a civil compromise offered by Bean, which is legal under Oregon law, influenced the young man’s decision. A judge had denied the offer in July.

“Mr. Bean offered him over $200,000 to civilly compromise this case,”...

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2015/09/200000-offer-ends-gay-democrats-child-sex-charges/#pxjlAGxTzGEeoyA1.99

So in the State of Oregon if someone like HRC founder and pederast Terry Bean has sex with an underage youth and is caught, but pays the youth money to not go through with the prosecution, that's the end of the criminal proceedings?

Sounds to me like child prostitution is legal in Oregon.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top