GFR7
New member
This to me is getting scary. Why don't I have a right to cite LaBarbera? I posted it because I believe what he is saying. I don't have the right to post from him, to point out what he asserts when I go check his site? In what way did that not fit in with the general discussion? Please tell me, because I would like to know what I am being rebuked for. I can't make it out.The "hippie movement", i.e. the sexual revolution/free love movement is far from collapsing.
Did you just compare the disco fad with the sexual anarchy movement?
So tell me, with incest and sex with children being illegal, are there "door to door searches" being done to make certain that those things don't take place?
I have one more question for you before I move on:
What is the purpose of you posting this? (Like disco, it's probably just a fad and it'll reach it's apex and reversal and just collapse).
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3963724&postcount=517
On that note: One of my favorite sayings over the years has been:
"Go with your gut instincts."
My gut instincts told me that you're a fraud, and once again my instincts were right.
I am a "fraud" in what way? Because I don't fall in lockstep with everything you are saying? A "fraud" in that you believe I am really pro-gay? In this case the sin is all in the eye of the beholder, as I have no reason to be a "fraud" on a forum like this. What would it gain me? It would be better to simply say that you don't agree with my views. But "fraud"? As in deliberately deceiving? To what purpose?
And yes, believe it or not, some cultural movements do wither away and leave room in their place for fresh growth and resurgence and rejuvenation. And I did not bring up "the disco culture" lightly - I believe it was a wicked and destructive movement and was happy when it collapsed.
Do you call every poster here who does not believe in a police state a "fraud"? Really am confused as I don't know where you are coming from.
Moreover, I feel put upon, as I have been both honest and respectful and am being picked on and I don't know why. They tried to warn me and I thought they were being infantile and paranoid.
Well, the old saying goes, "No offense intended." "Then none taken." So it is no matter as if I intended no offense then it is you who are wrong to have taken it. Sorry if you find LaBarbera's post offensive; I agree with his assessment of injured manhood and let it stand.