Why group marriage is the next horizon of social liberalism

[GFR7]

This article says it all, and speaks loudly to Justice Kennedy -

and to the true nature of his reasoning and logical deductions.


It’s Time to Legalize Polygamy
Why group marriage is the next horizon of social liberalism.
By FREDRIK DEBOER
June 26, 2015


Read more: http://www.politico.com/magazine/st...e-decision-polygamy-119469.html#ixzz3ePQ6eZQk

 

[Alate_One]

Polygamy has precedent in the Bible as well as dozens of other cultures around the world.

 

[GFR7]

Polygamy has precedent in the Bible as well as dozens of other cultures around the world.

Yes, it does: I have no doubt that in a few years time, SCOTUS will rule this in as well.......unless conservative justices have increased and replaced others.... :think:

 

[Buzzword]

Polygamy has precedent in the Bible as well as dozens of other cultures around the world.

And polyamory, which has a much smaller (read: zero) history of abuse, already has a devoted following in the West.

Read The Ethical Slut by Dossie Easton and Janet Hardy.

Many of these stem from multiple couples choosing to share lodging due to finances, and the "relationship" dynamic eventually shifted to fit their living situation, and in many cases they had greater success in childrearing due to more adults in the immediate vicinity available for emotional support.

 

[Ktoyou]

The Court did not legalize anything regarding marriage. Look here, a word is ony useful if it points at something, as to say, 'it is not that, it is this'. The word signifier, 'marriage' points to a signified, the 'union of a man and woman, not related by blood'.

The Court did not make any ruling on this, in fact one my as well call it a bula ruling since it impacts legal relations outside of marriage, and not one shall argue other wise, and will freely admit these other issues are the bases of the ruling.
I call it the bula ruling

 

[Sancocho]

The real question is will America still be around by the time polygamy is made legal. After all time and time again the Bible demonstrates those who hurt the innocent while claiming they are great will be punished. Fortunately, there are many real Christian countries to emigrate to before that happens.

 

[GFR7]

The Court did not legalize anything regarding marriage. Look here, a word is ony useful if it points at something, as to say, 'it is not that, it is this'. The word signifier, 'marriage' points to a signified, the 'union of a man and woman, not related by blood'.

The Court did not make any ruling on this, in fact one my as well call it a bula ruling since it impacts legal relations outside of marriage, and not one shall argue other wise, and will freely admit these other issues are the bases of the ruling.
I call it the bula ruling

So why are they marching all over the nation, lighting up rainbows,

and declaring "gay marriage the law of the land!" ???

mar·riage
ˈmerij/
noun
1.
the legally or formally recognized union of a man and a woman (or, in some jurisdictions, two people of the same sex) as partners in a relationship.
"a happy marriage"

 

[Alate_One]

Yes, it does: I have no doubt that in a few years time, SCOTUS will rule this in as well.......unless conservative justices have increased and replaced others.... :think:

Why should conservative justices block it?

 

[Ktoyou]

So why are they marching all over the nation, lighting up rainbows,

and declaring "gay marriage the law of the land!" ???

I guess for the same reason they have a desire to be naked, or almost naked in parades, or dressed in lady's clothes. They are nutty people.

The law will only impact on economic issues unless those not in favor of it , RECOGNIZE it!