... and I fantasize about killing them"
Yale professor
At this point, in today's society, I'd be amazed if she even gets censured by YaleHer name (and her looks) make me think she's middle-eastern.
Another mooslim, perhaps? Wouldn't be surprised if she was.
Regardless, her statements in the recording should have immediately prompted an investigation, and her statements here should have instantly prompted police to kick in her front door and barge into her house, and arrest her, at a minimum for bearing false witness, and perhaps for inciting murder, if not conspiracy to murder, in front of a judge, who should then convict her of such based on the recording and this video. The minimum punishment should be 40 lashes, if not execution.
Or by her professional licensing organizationsAt this point, in today's society, I'd be amazed if she even gets censured by Yale
IndianHer name (and her looks) make me think she's middle-eastern.
Hindu, apparentlyAnother mooslim, perhaps?
You're a moderator, right?Another mooslim, perhaps? Wouldn't be surprised if she was.
This isn't Twitter or Facebook or some other platform run by a bunch of pansies.You're a moderator, right?
Perhaps you should consider dialing back on the hateful language - just a thought.
You're a moderator, right?
Perhaps you should consider dialing back on the hateful language - just a thought.
I am surprised you would ask this question. Consider the term "negro". This is arguably an acceptable term to use, even today. But what happened to that term? It morphed into a derisive variant through some very subtle adjustments that I, of course, dare not spell out.In what way is calling muslims "mooslims" hateful?
Do you think Aruna Khilanani should consider dialing back on the hateful language?You're a moderator, right?
Perhaps you should consider dialing back on the hateful language - just a thought.
I am surprised you would ask this question. Consider the term "negro". This is arguably an acceptable term to use, even today. But what happened to that term? It morphed into a derisive variant through some very subtle adjustments that I, of course, dare not spell out.
Is that clear?
People don't choose their skin color but they do choose their religion. See the difference?I am surprised you would ask this question. Consider the term "negro". This is arguably an acceptable term to use, even today. But what happened to that term? It morphed into a derisive variant through some very subtle adjustments that I, of course, dare not spell out.
Is that clear?
"Mooslim" is the archaic spelling of the word, and "Muslim" is the contemporary spelling. That anyone would find this to be the point of objection rather than the blatantly racist hate speech of Aruna Khilanani is shocking.Except "mooslim" isn't a new term, either.
And as UN made mention of...
You're going after me for "hateful speech," when we have a woman saying she literally hates whites simply because they're white... Among other things that are FAR more hateful than the word "mooslim."
Who is guilty of such an offence? Certainly not me. You know nothing about my stance on Khilanani."Mooslim" is the archaic spelling of the word, and "Muslim" is the contemporary spelling. That anyone would find this to be the point of objection rather than the blatantly racist hate speech of Aruna Khilanani is shocking.
What is your stance on Khilanani?You know nothing about my stance on Khilanani.
Maybe I'm out of the loop, but I haven't heard much uproar over that. Or any.People can dance all they want, but we all know what modern day people are doing when they use the term "Mooslim".
Whataboutism. I have not offered any opinion on this woman yet. You are trying to get off the hook by using the "what she did was worse" line.You're going after me for "hateful speech," when we have a woman saying she literally hates whites simply because they're white... Among other things that are FAR more hateful than the word "mooslim."
The Yale School of Medicine said Khilanani’s lecture would not be made available to the general public after medical school leaders found “the tone and content antithetical to the values of the school.”At this point, in today's society, I'd be amazed if she even gets censured by Yale
I think her comments are abominable.What is your stance on Khilanani?
So her lecture won't be made available to the general public, will it? That sure sounds harsh! What do you think Yale School of Medicine would have done if this was a white person saying the same things about a minority racial or ethnic group?The Yale School of Medicine said Khilanani’s lecture would not be made available to the general public after medical school leaders found “the tone and content antithetical to the values of the school.”
I am not sure where you are heading. I have never posted anything in this thread, or any other, that would lead one to believe that I countenance racists speech from anyone, regardless of colour.So her lecture won't be made available to the general public, will it? That sure sounds harsh! What do you think Yale School of Medicine would have done if this was a white person saying the same things about a minority racial or ethnic group?