What's up Bob
- Thread starter fool
- Start date
- Status
What is #5?
What "new apologetic"
Is this in reference to another thread? If so, which one?
Well,
We have Bob's "companion to the answer thread";
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47023
Which spawned from Bob's Christian's answer to someolddeadguy's dilema"
Which seemed to be a rehash of the conversation me and Bob had some time ago;
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26929
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=26968
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27070
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=27149
So now that the resposeses have been purged, edited, split into nowhere, whatever you call it, I ask Bob if he has found a way around the part where he was telling me I hate God because I disagreed with him.
Why the new threads on the dilema he "solved" years ago?
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=47024
So what is "impasse too #5?"
I don't think he wrote it to deal with your arguments in that debate. If I recall, the Euthyphro Dilemma was raised by Zakath 5 years ago in Battle Royale VII (?). I think Bob has just continued to refine his response to it since then. Not sure though.
Last edited:
GuySmiley
Well-known member
I think he posted this new response to E. . .'s dilema becuase its a more detailed explanation, and will stand out on its own rather than be part of BR VII. Just my guess, and it makes sense. It doesn't imply the previous answer wasnt sound. Although I'll bet my house that if Bob found something else he believes unsound, he'd change his postion on it. What would anyone do?
EDIT: I should say, What would anyone honest do? (Bob has a history of publicly correcting himself, as Jefferson pointed out
)
EDIT: I should say, What would anyone honest do? (Bob has a history of publicly correcting himself, as Jefferson pointed out
)
Last edited:
Not only would he change his position on it, he would publish his previous errors for all the world to see. How many people do that?
It's part of the Biblical argument if the topic is atheism. If you are saying Bob uses that tactic as a cheap shot when people simply disagree with him, I'm saying you are a liar.
(and that is obnoxious)
In this case, it was a gratuitous cheap shot. I'm not saying Enyart does this all the time, but he certainly did when speaking with fool.
Remind him about the time he quoted that article about the Neanderthals found with musical instruments.
That was a Johnny catch.
Also if memory serves Johnny bagged him another time on some aspect of biology that made me drowsy.
Anyone remember that?
The reason I ask Bob what's up is that his new model dosen't look like the one he was running when we spoke in the landmark radio event "fool debates Bob on God's rights" parts 1 thru 4.
He ended that insisting that I must hate God if I would question the slaughter of the innocents.
Now with his new consensus model I ask Bob if the Holy Spirit tells the Son that he must hate the Father when the Son asks "do we really have to kill everybody?".
He ended that insisting that I must hate God if I would question the slaughter of the innocents.
Now with his new consensus model I ask Bob if the Holy Spirit tells the Son that he must hate the Father when the Son asks "do we really have to kill everybody?".
- Status