Is there a difference? Point it out.
Is there a difference? Point it out.
Absolutely no difference.
[Gal 2:6-9
[6] But from those who seemed to be something--whatever they were, it makes no difference to me; God shows personal favoritism to no man--for those who seemed [to be something] added nothing to me.
[7] But on the contrary, when they saw that the gospel for the uncircumcised had been committed to me, as [the gospel] for the circumcised [was] to Peter
[8] (for He who worked effectively in Peter for the apostleship to the circumcised also worked effectively in me toward the Gentiles),
[9] and when James, Cephas, and John, who seemed to be pillars, perceived the grace that had been given to me, they gave me and Barnabas the right hand of fellowship, that we [should go] to the Gentiles and they to the circumcised.
Then why is there a Gospel to the Circumcision and a Gospel to the Uncircumcision?
Different cultures.
The problem with this reoccurring question is the term "gospel". It is a synthetic word that had no place in the old or new testaments.
What word would do you prefer?
How about "good news"?