Would someone please list and explain them.
Actually I was looking for truth and doctrine.
Would these be considered reformed;In forums like this one where theological discourse is taking place, precision of word usage is important, in fact vital, for proper discussion. We cannot communicate effectively if we are all using words with multiple meanings to everyone involved. Accordingly, yours is a very good question!
In proper theological discourse, the words "Calvinist" and "Reformed," should not be left naked and unqualified, as they mean something specific and we should take the time to understand their meaning as understood by those steeped in the domain under discussion.
Quite plainly, a Calvinist is someone who affirms the doctrines of grace commonly defined by the acrostic, TULIP.
The word Reformed means those that affirm—without taking major scruples—one of the historical confessions of the Reformation era (Second Helvetic Confession, the Belgic Confession, the Heidelberg Catechism or the Westminster Standards), all of which which necessarily includes the doctrines of grace as well as specifics related to church polity, principles of worship, baptism, and much more.
For the Westminster Standards (WCF, WLC, WSC), see:
http://www.creeds.net/Westminster/contents.htm
Per the above, it helps to remember that...
All Reformed are Calvinists.
Not all Calvinists are Reformed.
I have no quibbles with anyone who wants to appropriate these labels for themselves in ordinary conversations. But when he or she enters the realm of theological discussion, they should expect to be questioned about how and why they are using these words when their discussion takes a turn outside the bounds of the historical meaning of these words to the theologically informed.
For a more detailed explanation about what it means to be "Reformed":
http://the-highway.com/how-many-points_Muller.html
AMR
If you add, Soli Deo Gloria, then, yes, the historical teachings of the Reformation behind these Five Solas, comprises the basic tenets of the Reformed faith.Would these be considered reformed;
Sola Scriptura
Sola Fide
Sola Gratia
Solus Christus
A heart of stone
Blindness
Pride
Superiority
Denominational History
They love pictures or photos of their favorite authors
What's so bad about Calvinists, or reformed?
What's so bad about Calvinists, or reformed?
They mix law with the evangelism thus condemning themselves and those that follow them.
They love titles. Reverend Doctor being a firm favorite.
What you probably don't want to hear is reformed theology is just a form of idolatry in which creeds and statements of faith become the idol by which they measure themselves and others. If you subscribe to the creeds or statement then you're in and if not you're out.
point 1, to my way of thinking may be taken if one will assume God has perfect justice.1. God elects or reproves on the foreseen faith or unbelief.
2. Christ died for all men although only believers are saved.
3. Man is so depraved that divine grace is necessary to bring man unto faith.
4. This grace may be resisted.
5. Whether or not all who are truly regenerate will certainly persevere requires further investigation.
AMR