Nazaroo
New member
Message to all who re-sign up
to pretend they are someone else.
I won't be responding to anyone with less than 300 posts here.
Any such characters I find I will put on ignore.
I will respond only to posts meeting the following conditions:
(1) They are on topic.
(2) They are not personal attacks.
(3) They are responsible questions based on science only (not religion or other vain philosophy).
(4) They are challenges based on on-topic verifiable scientific evidence,
or else scientifically falsifiable theories and/or hypotheses.
(5) If you pass that sieve, I will likely read and respond.
The following posers are on 'Block/Ignore'.
I won't be able to read any more posts from the following posters,
because I won't be 'unblocking' them anytime soon:
Noguru, gcthomas, Deadalous' Son, The Barbarian, Alwight, PureX, CabinetMaker, xAvarice, seekinganswers, Ben Masada, Memento Mori, Granite.
These posters have either repeatedly spammed my threads many times,
without contributing any worthwhile contribution to debate,
or else are so inconsistent in their behaviour as to be wholly unreliable,
and incapable of a sustained discussion.
I will respond to two recognized opponents:
Alate_One, and Chair, providing they can navigate the sieve above,
and are interested.
If you are not being answered,
check an updated list of blocked and ignored posters first,
on my TOL blog/profile.
If you have a question, but don't meet the criteria,
send a private message to people that I can see and respond to,
and ask them if they will post your question or response for you.
Remember that if your post is simply rude or insulting,
you will likely just get them put on block/ignore too,
so make sure you follow the rules above, for both your sakes.
Life's too short to waste time debating with those who aren't sincere
about possibility for exchange and learning on both sides.
I won't be debating committed atheists for the same reasons.
Science requires agnosticism in method, something I've observed
is usually impossible for atheists.
to pretend they are someone else.
I won't be responding to anyone with less than 300 posts here.
Any such characters I find I will put on ignore.
I will respond only to posts meeting the following conditions:
(1) They are on topic.
(2) They are not personal attacks.
(3) They are responsible questions based on science only (not religion or other vain philosophy).
(4) They are challenges based on on-topic verifiable scientific evidence,
or else scientifically falsifiable theories and/or hypotheses.
(5) If you pass that sieve, I will likely read and respond.
The following posers are on 'Block/Ignore'.
I won't be able to read any more posts from the following posters,
because I won't be 'unblocking' them anytime soon:
Noguru, gcthomas, Deadalous' Son, The Barbarian, Alwight, PureX, CabinetMaker, xAvarice, seekinganswers, Ben Masada, Memento Mori, Granite.
These posters have either repeatedly spammed my threads many times,
without contributing any worthwhile contribution to debate,
or else are so inconsistent in their behaviour as to be wholly unreliable,
and incapable of a sustained discussion.
I will respond to two recognized opponents:
Alate_One, and Chair, providing they can navigate the sieve above,
and are interested.
If you are not being answered,
check an updated list of blocked and ignored posters first,
on my TOL blog/profile.
If you have a question, but don't meet the criteria,
send a private message to people that I can see and respond to,
and ask them if they will post your question or response for you.
Remember that if your post is simply rude or insulting,
you will likely just get them put on block/ignore too,
so make sure you follow the rules above, for both your sakes.
Life's too short to waste time debating with those who aren't sincere
about possibility for exchange and learning on both sides.
I won't be debating committed atheists for the same reasons.
Science requires agnosticism in method, something I've observed
is usually impossible for atheists.