Understanding the Recent Populist Anti-New World Order Movement

[northwye]

Understanding the Recent Populist Anti-New World Order Movement

There are some - or many - who do not understand the present populist, nationalist , anti-Marxist or anti-New World Order movement. There are many Republicans who have been working for the elite, and for an international regime which appears to be Marxist for the masses and a kind of Fascism for the elite at the top.

An opposition, or dialectic, between this recent populist anti financial and corporate ruling elite and the supporters of this internationalist and collectivist drive for a more totalitarian world controlling elite in the Democratic Party and also in the Republican Party is too complicated for some. The simple opposition between the Republicans and the Democrats in the Fall 2016 election is much less complicated and more easily understood.

For example, someone posted a short article on Facebook about Karl Rove, the Republican operative and top advisor for the Bush family, erasing 22 million E Mails off private servers. The headlines for the Facebook post said: "Here. You want an email scandal? I got your email scandal right here." And "Flashback: Rove erases 22 million White House Emails on private server at height of U.S. attorney scandal. Media yawns."

The one who posted this on Karl Rove probably thought it would help discredit the Republicans and their supposed support of the populist anti-New World Order movement. But, in fact, the populist anti-New World Order movement is in opposition to Karl Rove, and to other Republicans who work for the New World Order. And the Republican Party operatives have mostly been against this new populist, anti-Marxist and anti-elite movement. It is the masses of the people who have supported this movement and this support has happened within the last year, or less.

The Bush family, for whom Karl Rove worked, includes President George H.W. Bush, son of the big banker Prescott Bush, father of former President George W. Bush, and Jeb Bush, who was thought to become the Republican candidate in 2016

See, the book, George Bush: The Unauthorized Biography, by Webster Tarpley. Chapter 8 of this book – The Permian Basin Gang - is relevant to the work of George H.W. Bush, or Daddy Bush in West Texas. "During the years following the Second World War, the patrician families of the Eastern Anglophile Liberal Establishment sent numbers of their offspring to colonize those geographic regions of the United States which, the families estimated, were likely to prosper in the postwar period".

"Since George Bush would shortly also become a landman, it is worth investigating what this occupation actually entails; in doing so, we will gain a permanent insight into Bush’s character. The role of the landman in the Texas oil industry was to try to identify properties where oil might be found, sometimes on the basis of leaked geological information, sometimes after observing that one of the major oil companies was drilling in the same locale. The land man would scout the property, and then attempt to get the owner of the land to sign away the mineral rights to the property in the form of a lease. If the property owner were well informed about the possibility that oil might in fact be found on his land, the price of the lease would obviously go up, because signing away the mineral rights meant that the income (or “royalties”) from any oil that might be found would never go to the owner of the land. A cunning landman would try to gather as much insider information as he could and keep the rancher as much in the dark as possible. In rural Texas in the 1940’s, the role of the landman could rather easily degenerate into that of the ruthless, money-grubbing con artist who would try to convince an ill-informed and possibly ignorant Texas dirt farmer who was just coming up for air after the great depression that the chances of finding oil on his land were just about zero, and that even a token fee for a lease on the mineral rights would be eminently worth taking."

In other words Daddy Bush, as a landman, cheated West Texas land owners.

But this Carpetbagger from an elite banking family of New England became President and on January 29, 1991 made has famous "New World Order" speech. "What is at stake is more than one small country; it is a big idea: a new world order, where diverse nations are drawn together in common cause to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind -- peace and security, freedom, and the rule of law."

Karl Rove moved to Texas in 1977. He became Senior Advisor to George W. Bush in 2001.

The key question is how to interpret George H.W. Bush's New World Order. In his 1991 speech, did he mean only that there was a New World Order following the fall of the Old Soviet Union? Or was Bush talking about an international rule of a small financial and corporate elite, which, in fact, would benefit from the fall of the Soviet Union? The policies promoted by Bush 41 and Bush 43 during the combined 12 years of their administrations point to the New World Order as being an international rule by a small elite of bankers and heads of huge international corporations.

And - for the 2016 election, the Bush family, as well as many other Establishment people, expected to see a race between Jeb Bush and Hillary. No matter which won, the agenda of the international elite would be advanced. But a Populist, Nationalist and Anti-New World Order movement has challenged that expectation. And - it appears that the Bush etc Establishment was taken by surprise.

 

[northwye]

Historian Quentin Skinner in The Foundations of Modern Political
Thought, 1978, goes over the influence of several Scotch and English Christians, such as John Knox and Samuel Rutherford, on John Locke and then on late 18th century American political ideology, the Declaration of Independence and the creation of the Constitutional Republic. The Bill of Rights is a part of the Constitutional Republic. It is a major part of what distinguishes a Costitutional Republic from a Democracy.

John Locke's book, Two Treatises of Government, according to Skinner, influenced Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence, and had an influence on James Madison and other Founding Fathers."

Isaiah 10: 1-2: "Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees, and that write grievousness which they have prescribed. To turn aside the needy from judgment, and to take away the right of the poor of my people, that widows may be their prey, and that they may rob the fatherless."

There are some other verses in the Old Testament about the right of the people.

The concept of the right of the people comes from God. The ancient Greek were into Democracy.

John Knox and Samuel Rutherford in Scotland, created, from scripture, a view that supported the right of the common people to oppose a totalitarian government, which does not respect the rights of the people.. These ideas of Knox and Rutherford were secularized by John Locke and Thomas Jefferson made them into the Declaration of Independence, one of
our founding documents which does briefly state a political ideology.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world."

This political ideology, whose beginnings come from the Bible as far as the rights of individuals are concerned, is now under threat by a financial and corporate ruling elite which has been setting up an international regime which is collectivist in nature, and opposed to individual rights and to Biblical Christian doctrines.

 

[Mark M]

Historian Quentin Skinner in The Foundations of Modern Political
Thought, 1978, goes over the influence of several Scotch and English Christians, such as John Knox and Samuel Rutherford, on John Locke and then on late 18th century American political ideology, the Declaration of Independence and the creation of the Constitutional Republic. The Bill of Rights is a part of the Constitutional Republic. It is a major part of what distinguishes a Costitutional Republic from a Democracy.

John Locke's book, Two Treatises of Government, according to Skinner, influenced Thomas Jefferson in the Declaration of Independence, and had an influence on James Madison and other Founding Fathers."

Isaiah 10: 1-2: "Woe unto them that decree unrighteous decrees, and that write grievousness which they have prescribed. To turn aside the needy from judgment, and to take away the right of the poor of my people, that widows may be their prey, and that they may rob the fatherless."

There are some other verses in the Old Testament about the right of the people.

The concept of the right of the people comes from God. The ancient Greek were into Democracy.

John Knox and Samuel Rutherford in Scotland, created, from scripture, a view that supported the right of the common people to oppose a totalitarian government, which does not respect the rights of the people.. These ideas of Knox and Rutherford were secularized by John Locke and Thomas Jefferson made them into the Declaration of Independence, one of
our founding documents which does briefly state a political ideology.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.--Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world."

This political ideology, whose beginnings come from the Bible as far as the rights of individuals are concerned, is now under threat by a financial and corporate ruling elite which has been setting up an international regime which is collectivist in nature, and opposed to individual rights and to Biblical Christian doctrines.

Interesting.

Sent from my Coolpad 3320A using Tapatalk