Trump would have won popular vote if california did not rig senate election rules

jeffblue101

New member
Trump would have won popular vote and beaten Romney's overall count, if californian democrats did not rig the senate candidate rules. Also if Evan Mcmullin didn't compete as strongly in utah.

take a look at these two maps first.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/politics/2016-election/precinct-post-analysis/






election.png


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Senate_election_in_California,_2016
Under California's nonpartisan blanket primary law, all candidates appear on the same ballot, regardless of party. In the primary, voters may vote for any candidate, regardless of their party affiliation. In the California system, the top two finishers — regardless of party — advance to the general election in November, even if a candidate manages to receive a majority of the votes cast in the primary election. Washington is the only other state with this system, a so-called "top two primary" (Louisiana has a similar "jungle primary")...

In the primary on June 7, 2016, California Attorney General Kamala Harris and U.S. Representative Loretta Sanchez, both Democrats, finished in first and second place, respectively, and contested the general election


With the fact that Trump's voter turnout was up everywhere else with the exception of utah because of Evan Mcmullin, california's candidate ballot rules definitely hurt Trump. Think about it for a moment, if you're a republican living in hell california and the only candidates on your ballet are democrats why would you show up to vote.

Another theory could be that most californians were high on election day.:think:
 
Top