The Marxist and leftist democrat way to operate a business

marke

Well-known member
Here is the pathway American democrats seem to think should be followed to be a successful business owner:

1. Go to an expensive university on government school loans, and get a secular degree.
2. Borrow money from the government or family for the business foundation and startup.
3. Hire an assortment of employees, insuring there is a healthy mixture of racial, sexual, and philosophical beliefs among the workers.
4. Pay the workers living wages and benefits due them as accorded by their civil and moral rights.
5. Do not be greedy and overcharge for your products like most business owners.
6. Ensure that your business does not harm the environment in any way and that it meets every possible green earth guideline for sustainable growth.
7. Hire counsellors to care for the emotional needs of employees.
8. Provide the best medical and hospitalization plans available.
9. Do not order your employees around like a fascist.
10. Set aside money for the care of employees' children and for paid maternity leave for both parents when a child is born.
11. Hire the best accountants to keep detailed records of how every dime in spent and to report to the IRS regularly to update them on all the money flowing through the business.
12. Report all profits and savings to the government authorities.
13. Donate to government charities like schools, hospitals, and abortion clinics, to maintain good will with the local citizenry.

And then let the regular, low profit-level, income flow!
 

marke

Well-known member
The dream of the woke secular high school student:

"I'll start my own business, make tons of money, buy me a car and a truck, buy me a house to live in near my business and a house for vacationing at the beach. I might even get married. Then the second year after school I may sell the business and retire on my savings.
 

marke

Well-known member
How much do leftist school kids know about how to succeed in business? And how much do leftist politicians know about how to make an economy grow and prosper?


A Larger-Than-Life Rebuke to AOC's Anti-Business Politics​

COMMENTARY
.
By Bill Zeiser
February 21, 2019

But perhaps the brightest luminary among New York City’s anti-Amazon politicians is Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, she of the Green New Deal. Ocasio-Cortez lauded the victory of “everyday New Yorkers” against Amazon’s “corporate greed, its worker exploitation, and the power of the richest man in the world.” She also suggested, bizarrely, that the incentives for Amazon — mostly tax breaks rather than direct handouts — could now be spent on social programs. For this, she was ripped by the likes of de Blasio, as well as Andrew Ross Sorkin of the New York Times, who tweeted that “there isn’t a $3 billion pile of money that can now be spent on subways or education.”
 

marke

Well-known member
Democrat morons think forcing businesses to adopt stupid, unreasonable, unethical, and racist policies will be good for those businesses and the economy. Democrat morons like that are idiots.


A Los Angeles judge has tossed a California law mandating that publicly traded corporations include board members who self-identify as people of color or a member of the LGBTQ community in response to a lawsuit arguing that the measure violated the state constitution’s equal protection clause.

Superior Court Judge Terry Green granted summary judgment Friday to Judicial Watch, the legal watchdog group that sued to overturn the 2020 law, according to the order posted online by the conservative legal foundation.

“This historic California court decision declared unconstitutional one of the most blatant and significant attacks in the modern era on constitutional prohibitions against discrimination,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said in a statement. “In its ruling today, the court upheld the core American value of equal protection under the law. Judicial Watch’s taxpayer clients are heroes for standing up for civil rights against the Left’s pernicious efforts to undo anti-discrimination protections.”
 
Top