The mandatory, compulsory, UN carbon tax

M

marke

Well-known member
American democrats have joined world leaders, movers, and shakers at the UN to impose draconian costs on the American people in the form of mandatory UN taxes for the sake of funding leftists approved by the UN to implement policies in line with the goals of the UN. Never mind the fact that these climate change quacks are on the wrong path and fighting something that is not real. Never mind that these morons seek to rob Americans in unjustifiable ways. These scientific quack, lazy-bum, do-nothing constructive highway robbers intend to rob Americans and others around the world of their hard-earned money, and American democrats are fully on board the confiscation of American wealth and assets by these thieves.


5. A Carbon Tax 46. A carbon tax, for the purposes of this Handbook, will be defned as a compulsory, unrequited payment to general government, levied on carbon emissions or its proxy that can confer a reduction in corresponding carbon-based (equivalent) emissions in the atmosphere and is thus characterized as having both environmental purpose and effect.18 47. This follows the general Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defnition of environmentally related taxes as “compulsory, unrequited payment to general government levied on tax-bases deemed to be of particular environmental relevance”.19 In this sense, carbon taxes can be seen as a specifc type of environmental tax, as per the OECD defnition of “[taxes] whose tax base is a physical unit (or a proxy of it) that ha[ve] a proven specifc negative impact on the environment”, namely CO2.
 
M

marke

Well-known member
marke said:
American democrats have joined world leaders, movers, and shakers at the UN to impose draconian costs on the American people in the form of mandatory UN taxes for the sake of funding leftists approved by the UN to implement policies in line with the goals of the UN. Never mind the fact that these climate change quacks are on the wrong path and fighting something that is not real. Never mind that these morons seek to rob Americans in unjustifiable ways. These scientific quack, lazy-bum, do-nothing constructive highway robbers intend to rob Americans and others around the world of their hard-earned money, and American democrats are fully on board the confiscation of American wealth and assets by these thieves.


5. A Carbon Tax 46. A carbon tax, for the purposes of this Handbook, will be defned as a compulsory, unrequited payment to general government, levied on carbon emissions or its proxy that can confer a reduction in corresponding carbon-based (equivalent) emissions in the atmosphere and is thus characterized as having both environmental purpose and effect.18 47. This follows the general Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defnition of environmentally related taxes as “compulsory, unrequited payment to general government levied on tax-bases deemed to be of particular environmental relevance”.19 In this sense, carbon taxes can be seen as a specifc type of environmental tax, as per the OECD defnition of “[taxes] whose tax base is a physical unit (or a proxy of it) that ha[ve] a proven specifc negative impact on the environment”, namely CO2.
Click to expand...
At least the UN mob bosses know something that Biden is still apparently ignorant of - the fact that brutal, mandatory, climate change policies will do great harm to the poor and struggling in the nation.

7.3 Potential distributional implications and corrective measures 74. Introducing a carbon tax may have distributional effects that raise concerns, especially impacting low-income household and consumers (see Chapter 7 for more details).
 
M

marke

Well-known member
marke said:
American democrats have joined world leaders, movers, and shakers at the UN to impose draconian costs on the American people in the form of mandatory UN taxes for the sake of funding leftists approved by the UN to implement policies in line with the goals of the UN. Never mind the fact that these climate change quacks are on the wrong path and fighting something that is not real. Never mind that these morons seek to rob Americans in unjustifiable ways. These scientific quack, lazy-bum, do-nothing constructive highway robbers intend to rob Americans and others around the world of their hard-earned money, and American democrats are fully on board the confiscation of American wealth and assets by these thieves.


5. A Carbon Tax 46. A carbon tax, for the purposes of this Handbook, will be defned as a compulsory, unrequited payment to general government, levied on carbon emissions or its proxy that can confer a reduction in corresponding carbon-based (equivalent) emissions in the atmosphere and is thus characterized as having both environmental purpose and effect.18 47. This follows the general Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defnition of environmentally related taxes as “compulsory, unrequited payment to general government levied on tax-bases deemed to be of particular environmental relevance”.19 In this sense, carbon taxes can be seen as a specifc type of environmental tax, as per the OECD defnition of “[taxes] whose tax base is a physical unit (or a proxy of it) that ha[ve] a proven specifc negative impact on the environment”, namely CO2
Click to expand...

The majority of people around the world reject the claims of the global warming quacks and especially reject the proposals to fleece the world of its wealth to give to climate change activists to be applied to implementing their goals. Climate change goals make a mockery of true science for their foolish assumptions and misunderstood and misapplied data.

Low acceptability has been an issue in failed attempts to implement carbon taxes, for example, in Washington State (United States of America), where a ballot initiative for a carbon tax was rejected in both 2016 and 2018. Similarly, in France, the gilets jaunes (yellow vests) protests in 2018 forced the government to suspend its proposal to escalate the existing carbon tax.31 Other experiences illustrate how 28 See Chapter 2. 29 Harring et al., 2019. 30 Feldman and Hart, 2017. 31 Maestre-Andrés et al., 2019. - 38 - United Nations Handbook On Carbon Taxation For Developing Countries low public acceptability has restricted policymaking and limited implementation
 
M

marke

Well-known member
marke said:
American democrats have joined world leaders, movers, and shakers at the UN to impose draconian costs on the American people in the form of mandatory UN taxes for the sake of funding leftists approved by the UN to implement policies in line with the goals of the UN. Never mind the fact that these climate change quacks are on the wrong path and fighting something that is not real. Never mind that these morons seek to rob Americans in unjustifiable ways. These scientific quack, lazy-bum, do-nothing constructive highway robbers intend to rob Americans and others around the world of their hard-earned money, and American democrats are fully on board the confiscation of American wealth and assets by these thieves.


5. A Carbon Tax 46. A carbon tax, for the purposes of this Handbook, will be defned as a compulsory, unrequited payment to general government, levied on carbon emissions or its proxy that can confer a reduction in corresponding carbon-based (equivalent) emissions in the atmosphere and is thus characterized as having both environmental purpose and effect.18 47. This follows the general Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defnition of environmentally related taxes as “compulsory, unrequited payment to general government levied on tax-bases deemed to be of particular environmental relevance”.19 In this sense, carbon taxes can be seen as a specifc type of environmental tax, as per the OECD defnition of “[taxes] whose tax base is a physical unit (or a proxy of it) that ha[ve] a proven specifc negative impact on the environment”, namely CO2.
Click to expand...
Carbon taxes will ultimately be taken from the earnings of workers, not corporations or governments. No wonder so many people oppose such highway robbery for a cause so few people are deceived into believing is important.

7. In the case of a carbon tax, the tax incidence depends on whether the entities obliged to pay the tax can pass it on to the consumers. If the entities can raise the product price to compensate for the full amount of the tax, the tax incidence falls completely on the consumers. It is important to emphasize that a change in consumer behaviour is needed for the tax to fulfl the purpose of reducing emissions. If the producer is neither able to abate emissions nor raise the product price, the producer will bear the full incidence of the tax, consumption will be unaffected, and carbon dioxide (CO2 ) emissions will not be reduced. 148. There are several important issues to consider in this discussion. For instance, if a regulated price exists, it may not be possible to increase the price and pass the burden of the tax. In this case, the tax burden falls on the taxpaying entities, reducing their profts. Under these circumstances, a carbon tax will not reduce emissions and operate as a revenue raiser, at least in the short term.
 
M

marke

Well-known member
marke said:
American democrats have joined world leaders, movers, and shakers at the UN to impose draconian costs on the American people in the form of mandatory UN taxes for the sake of funding leftists approved by the UN to implement policies in line with the goals of the UN. Never mind the fact that these climate change quacks are on the wrong path and fighting something that is not real. Never mind that these morons seek to rob Americans in unjustifiable ways. These scientific quack, lazy-bum, do-nothing constructive highway robbers intend to rob Americans and others around the world of their hard-earned money, and American democrats are fully on board the confiscation of American wealth and assets by these thieves.


5. A Carbon Tax 46. A carbon tax, for the purposes of this Handbook, will be defned as a compulsory, unrequited payment to general government, levied on carbon emissions or its proxy that can confer a reduction in corresponding carbon-based (equivalent) emissions in the atmosphere and is thus characterized as having both environmental purpose and effect.18 47. This follows the general Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defnition of environmentally related taxes as “compulsory, unrequited payment to general government levied on tax-bases deemed to be of particular environmental relevance”.19 In this sense, carbon taxes can be seen as a specifc type of environmental tax, as per the OECD defnition of “[taxes] whose tax base is a physical unit (or a proxy of it) that ha[ve] a proven specifc negative impact on the environment”, namely CO2.
Click to expand...
Egghead elitists who have fallen prey to the climate change lie believe taxes on workers are necessary to get them to change their ways, but these elitist morons have no intention of changing their own ways. The hypocrisy of leading climate change proponents is truly astounding.

154. Carbon taxes have some distinct features that make them different from other taxes. The primary purpose of a carbon tax is not to raise revenue but to change the behaviour of households and frms. An effective carbon tax should incentivise the reduction in carbon emissions.
 
M

marke

Well-known member
marke said:
American democrats have joined world leaders, movers, and shakers at the UN to impose draconian costs on the American people in the form of mandatory UN taxes for the sake of funding leftists approved by the UN to implement policies in line with the goals of the UN. Never mind the fact that these climate change quacks are on the wrong path and fighting something that is not real. Never mind that these morons seek to rob Americans in unjustifiable ways. These scientific quack, lazy-bum, do-nothing constructive highway robbers intend to rob Americans and others around the world of their hard-earned money, and American democrats are fully on board the confiscation of American wealth and assets by these thieves.


5. A Carbon Tax 46. A carbon tax, for the purposes of this Handbook, will be defned as a compulsory, unrequited payment to general government, levied on carbon emissions or its proxy that can confer a reduction in corresponding carbon-based (equivalent) emissions in the atmosphere and is thus characterized as having both environmental purpose and effect.18 47. This follows the general Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defnition of environmentally related taxes as “compulsory, unrequited payment to general government levied on tax-bases deemed to be of particular environmental relevance”.19 In this sense, carbon taxes can be seen as a specifc type of environmental tax, as per the OECD defnition of “[taxes] whose tax base is a physical unit (or a proxy of it) that ha[ve] a proven specifc negative impact on the environment”, namely CO2.
Click to expand...
AOC was right. The global warming tax imposed by the UN and its lickspittle democrat stooges in America will likely cost American taxpayers trillions of dollars, with never-ending tax hikes for the future. AOC was wrong to support such nonsense.

Ideally, the introduction of a carbon tax should include a political commitment to increase rates over time to reach a specifc emission reduction target. The implementation of hard commitments to raise carbon prices is diffcult, but some design features may help. Examples include politically committing to higher rates when carbon prices rise in neighbouring countries or with trading partners, ensuring that changes to the tax rate do not require changing primary legislation, and ensuring that the revenue generation and use is integrated in the fscal policy.6
 
M

marke

Well-known member
marke said:
American democrats have joined world leaders, movers, and shakers at the UN to impose draconian costs on the American people in the form of mandatory UN taxes for the sake of funding leftists approved by the UN to implement policies in line with the goals of the UN. Never mind the fact that these climate change quacks are on the wrong path and fighting something that is not real. Never mind that these morons seek to rob Americans in unjustifiable ways. These scientific quack, lazy-bum, do-nothing constructive highway robbers intend to rob Americans and others around the world of their hard-earned money, and American democrats are fully on board the confiscation of American wealth and assets by these thieves.


5. A Carbon Tax 46. A carbon tax, for the purposes of this Handbook, will be defned as a compulsory, unrequited payment to general government, levied on carbon emissions or its proxy that can confer a reduction in corresponding carbon-based (equivalent) emissions in the atmosphere and is thus characterized as having both environmental purpose and effect.18 47. This follows the general Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defnition of environmentally related taxes as “compulsory, unrequited payment to general government levied on tax-bases deemed to be of particular environmental relevance”.19 In this sense, carbon taxes can be seen as a specifc type of environmental tax, as per the OECD defnition of “[taxes] whose tax base is a physical unit (or a proxy of it) that ha[ve] a proven specifc negative impact on the environment”, namely CO2.
Click to expand...
Gas prices will necessarily skyrocket as the UN imposes high taxes on fossil fuels. Democrats applaud the high taxes to supposedly fight global warming, sane Americans are absolutely opposed to such poverty-inducing nonsense. Americans do not want to pay $5 per gallon this year and more and more every succeeding year to meet greedy climate change advocates' financing goals.

241. The Fuel Approach is the predominant method of carbon taxation around the world. It involves taxing fossil fuels, primarily oil, gas, coal, and their derivative products, and setting the tax rate based on the carbon content of the fuel. The key to this approach is that carbon emissions are closely related to the carbon content of a specifc fuel; therefore, emissions from fuel combustion can be determined accurately by standardized carbon emission factors.
 
M

marke

Well-known member
marke said:
American democrats have joined world leaders, movers, and shakers at the UN to impose draconian costs on the American people in the form of mandatory UN taxes for the sake of funding leftists approved by the UN to implement policies in line with the goals of the UN. Never mind the fact that these climate change quacks are on the wrong path and fighting something that is not real. Never mind that these morons seek to rob Americans in unjustifiable ways. These scientific quack, lazy-bum, do-nothing constructive highway robbers intend to rob Americans and others around the world of their hard-earned money, and American democrats are fully on board the confiscation of American wealth and assets by these thieves.


5. A Carbon Tax 46. A carbon tax, for the purposes of this Handbook, will be defned as a compulsory, unrequited payment to general government, levied on carbon emissions or its proxy that can confer a reduction in corresponding carbon-based (equivalent) emissions in the atmosphere and is thus characterized as having both environmental purpose and effect.18 47. This follows the general Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defnition of environmentally related taxes as “compulsory, unrequited payment to general government levied on tax-bases deemed to be of particular environmental relevance”.19 In this sense, carbon taxes can be seen as a specifc type of environmental tax, as per the OECD defnition of “[taxes] whose tax base is a physical unit (or a proxy of it) that ha[ve] a proven specifc negative impact on the environment”, namely CO2.
Click to expand...
What is needed in the US to meet Paris Accord/UN climate tax policies? The US must beef up the IRs, the EPA, other government agencies, and may need to create new agencies. Such expansion of the government could easily cost additional tens of billions of tax dollars yearly and that does not even begin to cover the costs of the actual taxes themselves. If there is one thing unsaved rebels against God are famous for it is their stupidity. The US government is already bloated to the point of bursting, and yet leftist morons keep adding more and more to its size and costs, unaware that they are contributing to the inevitable downfall of the entire nation.

492. This chapter has discussed the administrative issues raised by a carbon tax, considering the specifc issues raised by the different tax design approaches. Drawing heavily from the cases of Sweden and Chile, it explored some of the more relevant administrative decisions that authorities must make. 493. The chapter dealt with general administrative issues and specifcally the - 152 - United Nations Handbook On Carbon Taxation For Developing Countries role of tax authorities. In this context, the relevance of clearly stating the role of the involved competent authorities has been underscored. Furthermore, special attention should be paid to inter-administrative cooperation relations (particularly in cases of fscal federalism or regional groupings). It also discussed the importance of public consultations and information campaigns, and how they may be benefcial in improving administration and public acceptance. 494. The chapter also analysed, considering the different approaches, the detailed regulations of the core elements of good administration that promote compliance, such as how to ensure greater certainty in the measurement of the tax base, or how to deal with fling and reporting obligations. 495. Nevertheless, it is impossible to deal with all administrative issues effectively. Carbon tax design and implementation are dynamic and, therefore, we argued that administrative requirements should facilitate ex-post evaluation to ensure the necessary adjustments to both the design and administration of the tax.
 
M

marke

Well-known member
Democrats blamed Trump for all coronavirus deaths during his presidency. They promoted Biden as the man to put a stop to the coronavirus. They were wrong. Very badly wrong. However, they don't blame Biden for a single coronavirus death because Biden is a democrat and democrats do no wrong to those democrat cultists who believe humans can do miracles if they are leftist Marxists in their politics.

Democrats have been badly wrong about the devastating effects of the needless business, school, and church shutdowns; they have been badly wrong about the serious consequences of shutting down oil production in America; they have been badly wrong about the economic damages caused by reckless overspending, and they are badly wrong about climate change.

There is no doubt that climate change alarmism has taken a delusive hold on millions of people around the world, but their fears are unfounded. There is no climate change danger that humans caused or could do anything about even if it was real. One of the strongest motives behind the propagation of climate change false doctrines is money, and thousands of greedy men and women around the world promote erroneous ideas about climate change for the ultimate financial benefit they receive by promoting the lie instead of resisting the lie.

How much will the wealthy of the world (Americans, mostly) have to pay to satisfy the greedy 'needs' of the climate alarmists seeking to cure the weather? Nobody knows, yet everyone knows the costs will range from the hundreds of billions into the tens of trillions and more, as much as can be confiscated from the earnings of those people still working and paying taxes.

Put into simple terms, if you make $100,000 per year today then you could soon end up seeing a $10,000 per year increase in your yearly taxes to UN global rulers to fight global warming in the coming years.

www.globalgiving.org

How Much Would It Cost To End Climate Change?

Learn more about the impacts of climate change and what it would take to end it.
www.globalgiving.org www.globalgiving.org

Estimates of how much money it would take to end global climate change range between $300 billion and $50 trillion over the next two decades.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top