But remember, "the monarch has the courtesy to die"...Originally posted by granite1010
I'm not sure what's worse: a democratic rule by the majority, or a serfdom run by monarchs.
Then why are the elitists establishing a democracy in Iraq if they dislike it so much?Originally posted by Zakath
Monarchy gives the elite a license to steal while democracy spreads the opportunity to the masses. That's why elitists dislike democracy so much - it cuts into their potential profit.
Simple: it's more profitable.Originally posted by Jefferson
Then why are the elitists establishing a democracy in Iraq if they dislike it so much?
Originally posted by Jefferson
Then why are the elitists establishing a democracy in Iraq if they dislike it so much?
I think it has more to do with their old tried and true maxims: Divide and conquer. And order out of chaos. In a democracy the people are divided against one another; Republicans vrs. Democrats, liberals vrs. conservatives.Originally posted by Gerald
Simple: it's more profitable.
You know, like getting two factions to fight, and then supplying arms to them both...:greedy:
Originally posted by Jefferson
I think it has more to do with their old tried and true maxims: Divide and conquer. And order out of chaos. In a democracy the people are divided against one another; Republicans vrs. Democrats, liberals vrs. conservatives.