in what way am i lying?
Should Women Be Beaten?
- Thread starter resurrected
- Start date
in what way am i lying?
Of course we wouldnt, but then again we dont think turning ones spouse over their knee and using corporal punishment on them to be restraining them from abusing a child, and consider the use of corporal punishment on a spouse to also be abuse.
Well, if you guys ever think about getting your wife to make love to you more often...don't ever tell her "you skipped a week" thems is fightin' words for a woman
You know i think no such thing. Thats how.
I'm deeply sorry for you confusion in this matter. Better not start any more families until you get it worked out. Let me help you a bit, if you need to stop your wife from beating her children it is okay to get between the mother and the child and even wrap your arms around her to prevent her from further hitting anybody. Its okay to pick her up and carry her out of the room to let her cool off. She may slap you. That does not mean that it is okay for you to slap her back.
play your game, i dont care.
We could make money if this were reality tv
This stuff is priceless
For the record: res is not a wife beatin cheatin sob
That's obvious from his commentary
Do men get the urge to beat women?
Of course they do and that's why it happens. Men beat their women into submission because sadly it works.
The bible teaches we are to love our wives into submission. Sometimes we fail. Sometimes the wife can be extremely rebellious and that fits res' description of his x.
Women according to the bible are cursed with a nature that seeks to usurp their husband's authority. They can't help it anymore than men can't stop lusting. But they can respond to Christ in us if we learn to love them and we can learn to respond to Christ in them and stop lusting.
Sin is so pervasive...where's GT
This stuff is priceless
For the record: res is not a wife beatin cheatin sob
That's obvious from his commentary
Do men get the urge to beat women?
Of course they do and that's why it happens. Men beat their women into submission because sadly it works.
The bible teaches we are to love our wives into submission. Sometimes we fail. Sometimes the wife can be extremely rebellious and that fits res' description of his x.
Women according to the bible are cursed with a nature that seeks to usurp their husband's authority. They can't help it anymore than men can't stop lusting. But they can respond to Christ in us if we learn to love them and we can learn to respond to Christ in them and stop lusting.
Sin is so pervasive...where's GT
Do you see what he is doing here? He is making it sound as though his wife was beating the children. She, of course, is not here to tell her side of this accusation. Nor is she here to confirm or deny the veracity of his claims that she was physically abusive.
There is no truth in this person.
i'm not sure why you think i'm confused :idunno:
what if she's bigger than me?
yes bybee
we're discussing scenarios
instead of assuming, next time ask and perhaps you won't be so easily fooled by your buddies who spit on Christ
Exactly. Domestic and child abuse is a serious subject matter ... nothing to make light over.
The title of the OP was done to rile up the other members, women especially.
Personally speaking, I consider the source and know very well that no decent man would ever joke or make light of this issue.
Due to the fact that I don't believe anything that comes off of the tips of his fingers, it's not possible to make a determination. It's just as probable that there were no confrontations and this is just another "Res seeking attention" moment.
seeing that you spit on Christ's free offer of salvation, i can't imagine why you're allowed to continue posting here
why don't you just go straight to hell rusha and save us the bother of having to put up with you?
you're heading there eventually
why don't you just go straight to hell rusha and save us the bother of having to put up with you?
you're heading there eventually
Nothing you have posted has given my any confidence in your ability to distinguish abuse from reasonable restraint.
Then I would call you coward for not doing the best you could defend one who is even smaller than you.
well, you did kinda come in in the middle
today's post
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3854976&postcount=152
on this thread was a continuation of a discussion that had been ongoing in another thread:
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=3854969#post3854969
there's links embedded but you can't see them very well
in that other thread rusha (the hell-bound God-denying pervert) posted a definition of physical abuse that included restraint (and mean looks and raised voices, i guess)
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showpost.php?p=3854939&postcount=112
even if it involved physical force?
Seems to me that you are going to great lengths to misconstrued the definition provided. from the above link:
Domestic violence, also known as domestic abuse, spousal abuse, battering, family violence, dating abuse, and intimate partner violence (IPV), is a pattern of behavior
Restraint can be a pattern of behavior but it can also be the correct course of action when somebody has lost control and needs to be stopped from hurting themselves or somebody else. I think that Rusha would agree with that.
Yes, even if physical force is involved. The key lies in the level of force used and the motive for doing so. If you are protecting yourself and/or others then you use the force you need to stop the battery. If you go beyond that and use more force than you need because you are angry and wish to inflict pain for the sake of retribution then you have crossed the line.
You are correct. :thumb:
what constitutes a "pattern of behavior"?
one instance?
two?
a couple times a year?
she didn't appear to in the other thread :idunno:
nobody was interested in discussing motive in the other thread
just jumping to conclusions
:thumb:
it's nice to discuss this with someone who isn't ruled by their emotions