SCOTUS Upholds Obamacare . . . again.

Jonahdog

BANNED
Banned
Oh no. Next dogs and cats living together.

What kind of right wing appointment was John Roberts anyway. I think he must have been a Manchurian Candidate supplied by the left from the get go. He was probably brain washed by his liberal college and law school professors so many years ago, just so the right could be tricked into getting him appointed. We all know that W would never have appointed him if he really knew, perhaps he just snuck in during all the hoopla over yellow cake uranium. Yeah, thats it.

Now lets see how much time and energy the Rethugs waste dealing with this issue, over and over and over and over.
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
you got what you voted for
you voted for clinton and obama
and
you got breyer, ginsburg, sotomayor, and kagan
and
another clinton could give you three more
if
that is not enough for you
 

chrysostom

Well-known member
Hall of Fame
how would you like roberts to interpret the bible for you?

any ambiguous passage must consider as context

the whole bible
 

republicanchick

New member
how would you like roberts to interpret the bible for you?

any ambiguous passage must consider as context

the whole bible

good point...

all those libs who claim to be Christian should take note

whether they will or not..

but in any case... no such thing as a liberal Christian



+
 

rexlunae

New member
:up:

Bring upon the great and awesome day of the Lord. I am all for it.

Christian eschatology is so myopic. So, Jesus sat out through the fall or Rome, one of the great ancient empires, as well as the bulwark of the Christian world of the time. Nations rose, and fell, and were appointed the new Roman Empire, and no sign from Jesus. Revolutions, reformations, 30-Year-Wars, Muslims conquered the Holy Land, and Jesus was nowhere to be found. World wars, massacres, holocausts, and silence from God.

But now, health care will be subsidized for the poor, so come deliver us Jesus!!!1!1!!!
 

rougueone

New member
" Disparate impact " . A " legal theory", that is not succinct to a specific group of people, but most certainly to a " protected class" of people. Hence the ruling. A " protected class" prevail's.
 
Top