Scientist says lockdown was unneccesary

Gary K

New member
Banned
Michael Levitt, a professor of structural biology at Stanford, and the winner of the 2013 Nobel Prize for Chemistry for "the development of multiscale models for complex chemical systems" is saying that the lock down around the world was unneeded and may actually backfire.

 

chair

Well-known member
The same gentleman predicted that Israel would have a maximum of 10 deaths. We have 234 dead so far.

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/n...ve-no-more-than-ten-coronavirus-deaths-621407 [h=1]Nobel laureate: surprised if Israel has more than 10 coronavirus deathsIsraeli Nobel Prize winner Michael Levitt has predicted that no more than ten Israelis will succumb to COVID-19 – and even less with the new restrictions – since the number of cases is so few.[/h] By DONNA RACHEL EDMUNDS
MARCH 20, 2020 12:20
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
The same gentleman predicted that Israel would have a maximum of 10 deaths. We have 234 dead so far.

https://www.jpost.com/israel-news/n...ve-no-more-than-ten-coronavirus-deaths-621407 [h=1]Nobel laureate: surprised if Israel has more than 10 coronavirus deathsIsraeli Nobel Prize winner Michael Levitt has predicted that no more than ten Israelis will succumb to COVID-19 – and even less with the new restrictions – since the number of cases is so few.[/h] By DONNA RACHEL EDMUNDS
MARCH 20, 2020 12:20

/thread
 

Gary K

New member
Banned
But no one else got anything wrong? The governments of England and Italy guessed exactly right on the future medical needs of their people and that's why their medical system didn't get overwhelmed but bore up under the load very well with zero failures in numbers of beds, numbers medical devices, great preparation for all emergencies, the correct numbers of medical personnel and the exact training for those personnel, etc...? No failures whatsoever. Right?
 

way 2 go

Well-known member
cnn used Prof. Neil Ferguson numbers saying 2.2 million americans could die from the CCP virus


"Steven exposes the history behind Prof. Neil Ferguson, the man who originally predicted 2.2 million Coronavirus deaths and how wrong he's been."

 

7djengo7

This space intentionally left blank
This chart right here is all you need to see who got it right, who got it wrong, and why:


Did you create that chart? Did you scientifically arrive at the figures you're handing out on that chart, or were they merely handed to you by some whom you revere as "science", while you're merely parroting them to others?
 

Aimiel

Well-known member
The link to the source of the chart as well as it's author is at the bottom of the chart. :duh:
 

chair

Well-known member
But no one else got anything wrong? The governments of England and Italy guessed exactly right on the future medical needs of their people and that's why their medical system didn't get overwhelmed but bore up under the load very well with zero failures in numbers of beds, numbers medical devices, great preparation for all emergencies, the correct numbers of medical personnel and the exact training for those personnel, etc...? No failures whatsoever. Right?

Oh, plenty of people and organizations got things wrong. The UK, Spain, Italy and US made basic errors. The entire western world didn't understand that masks are useful.

My point is that just because one person says something that you like, doesn't mean he is right. Even if he is a scientist (a chemist mind you- not epidemiologist) and a Nobel prize winner.
 

Arthur Brain

Well-known member
Arthur Brain, chair, and eider do not even understand something as simple as the fact that lockdowns and curfews are bans against people leaving their homes. :)

Actually, we do understand the measures in place, the ramifications of such and are kinda tired of repeatedly explaining such to someone who is either a kid or for some reason acting like one.
 
Top