Real Science Radio: More Soft Tissue Confirms RSR Dino Prediction

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
More Soft Tissue Confirms RSR Dino Prediction

This is the show from Wednesday June 10th, 2015

Summary:



* Dinosaur Soft Tissue is COMMON
: Today's special edition of Real Science Radio reports on the latest astounding recovery of actual dinosaur soft tissue (See right, the false-color photograph of actual dinosaur collagen!) David Coppedge, former ground computer administrator for NASA's Cassini Saturn mission, joins Bob Enyart to discuss this week's reports in the journals Nature and Science of more, and more, and more red blood cells soft tissue being discovered in dinosaur bones. As at rsr.org/predictions, this confirms Bob's and Fred Williams' 2014 creation science prediction that dinosaur soft tissue will be found not only in rare circumstances, but rather easily, i.e., when looked for. As reported by Coppedge at his important Creation Evolution Headlines website at crev.info, via the journal Science: "this week's issue of Nature Communications backs up previous, controversial reports of such structures in dinosaur bones. It also suggests that soft tissue preservation may be more common than anyone had guessed. 'It’s encouraging,' especially because the proteins were found in what appear to be the most unremarkable, ordinary bones..."

* From rsr.org/creation-science-predictions: RSR confidently predicted the very OPPOSITE of what the science journals had claimed! Every old-earth scientist and every media outlet and scientific journal that addressed the issue claimed that only in very rare circumstances has dinosaur tissue survived till the present. But on February 21, 2014 we predicted on our regular Real Science Radio broadcast and in the written show summary that dinosaur soft tissue was not rare but could be found easily. Here's what we predicted, and the confirmation notice:

Dinosaur soft tissue will be found not only in rare circumstances, but rather easily, i.e., when looked for.
CONFIRMED in May 2015! From the world's leading journal, Nature, and at crev.info as reported as reported in Science, America's leading journal:Signs of ancient cells and proteins found in dinosaur fossils, "this week's issue of Nature Communications backs up previous, controversial reports of such structures in dinosaur bones. It also suggests that soft tissue preservation may be more common than anyone had guessed. 'It’s encouraging,' especially because the proteins were found in what appear to be the most unremarkable, ordinary bones, says Matthew Collins, an archaeologist and biochemist at the University of York in the United Kingdom."

* The Bill Nye & Neil deGrasse Tyson Irony: When Bill Nye and Neil deGrasse Tyson said that creationists cannot make scientific predictions that would be later confirmed, ironically, they helped to publicize the many astounding confirmed predictions of creation scientists! They also helped make our very own Real Science Radio program more discoverable to the general public. UPDATE: When searching the web for: creation science predictions, Google ranks our own program, RSR's List of Creation Science Predictions, at #3 of 1.2 million pages! And see that program for the astounding confirmation of another RSR soft tissue prediction and for many more creationist predictions including a dozen that have already been confirmed!
 

Jonahdog

BANNED
Banned
Lets have someone from AiG or Liberty University do the research that definitively shows the age of these "soft tissues". Nobel will be waiting.
 

Jonahdog

BANNED
Banned
Ah, the evolutionist's wail of defeat.

:mock: evolutionism.

Uh, no. Not a wail of defeat. A suggestion that perhaps creation scientists might want to do some real research. Doesn't AiG have Georgia Purdom on staff? Have her get working on this. Turn biology on its head. Save millions for your god.

Not happening is it Stripe? Ever wonder why? Guess it is either the grand global atheist conspiracy or the fact that creationism is intellectually dishonest and bankrupt.
 

Jonahdog

BANNED
Banned
If it wasn't, you might have a rational argument to offer.

Well then, perhaps you believe having creation scientists do their own research to support the allegation that finding such "soft tissue" means the earth is about 6000 years old is irrational. If that is the case, it would be one of the few times you were accurate and correct.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Well then, perhaps you believe having creation scientists do their own research to support the allegation that finding such "soft tissue" means the earth is about 6000 years old is irrational. If that is the case, it would be one of the few times you were accurate and correct.

:yawn: Wake us up when you've got something sensible to contribute.
 

Jonahdog

BANNED
Banned
:yawn: Wake us up when you've got something sensible to contribute.

Let me know when one of your creation scientists show us why "soft tissue" means the earth is about 6000 years old. In the meantime enjoy your lack of understanding and your fear of the real world.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Let me know when one of your creation scientists show us why "soft tissue" means the earth is about 6000 years old.

It doesn't.

Soft tissue indicates that dinos died recently.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
How recently?

Difficult to say without an extensive overhaul of the way these sorts of things are tested.

However, it seems impossible for them to have died more than about 10,000 years ago, let alone millions of years ago.
How [could] we know that?
Carbon 12/14 dating would settle the debate of old ages.
 

Nick M

Plymouth Colonist
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Difficult to say without an extensive overhaul of the way these sorts of things are tested.

However, it seems impossible for them to have died more than about 10,000 years ago, let alone millions of years ago.
Carbon 12/14 dating would settle the debate of old ages.

Thus ends the discussion.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Ask Dr. Stripe to weigh his car on his bathroom scale. Same issue. But he knows that just ignores the issue because it does not fit with his theology.

:chuckle: You have no idea what you're talking about, do you? Weighing a car on bathroom scales will send the needle past its limit, breaking the scales. C14 testing a dino will do one of two things: Show no C14 present, supporting the evolutionists' story; or show significant C14 present, supporting — along with the soft tissue — its young age.

Retract your stupid analogy and you might be able to join a rational discussion. :up:
 

User Name

Greatest poster ever
Banned
C14 testing a dino will do one of two things: Show no C14 present, supporting the evolutionists' story; or show significant C14 present, supporting — along with the soft tissue — its young age.

How far back can C14 dating accurately measure?
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
How far back can C14 dating accurately measure?

About 50,000 years. Which is why JD's scales analogy is such a failure.

Would you like to help encourage him to retract it, or are you only here to oppose the Biblical account?
 
Top