Real Science Friday: Another Prediction Confirmed!

Jefferson

Administrator
Staff member
Administrator
Super Moderator
Creation Mag Headlines & Another Prediction Confirmed!

This is the show from Friday April 11th, 2014

Summary:

* Another Code Revealed Within DNA Code: Real Science Radio hosts Bob Enyart and Fred Williams enjoy the latest science news from Creation magazine. They celebrate God's brilliance demonstrated by His embedding into DNA yet another newly discovered code (you'll love the "vowels" analogy)!

* An Oil Field That's About 14,000 or 370 Million Years Old: And the guys chuckle about secular dating of an oil field based on the age of fossils which range, allegedly, from only thousands of years to 370 million years!

* Another Astounding RSR Prediction Confirmed: Bob and Fred's latest creation prediction has been confirmed by the March 2014 issue of the Journal of Paleontology! So, falsifying Bill Nye's claim that Christians cannot make science predictions bsaed on the book of Genesis, once again, an astoundingly specific and counter-intuitive RSR prediction has been confirmed by a peer-reviewed paper. On February 21, 2014 the RSR hosts made this written and broadcast prediction: Original dinosaur soft tissue, etc., will be found largely independent of the claimed age of the fossil. This was confirmed in March 2014! See the upcoming RSR update on this paper in the Journal of Paleontology that has confirmed original soft tissue in a fossil allegedly 530 million years old!

* Please Help Real Science Radio Continue To Broadcast: Bob Enyart and Fred Williams need your help! The guys don't have a foundation that is funding them, nor do they have a mega-church or national ministry paying the bills. All they have is their wives, making sure that the guys don't bankrupt their families while trying to reach more and more people with the truth of God as our Creator, including by presenting God's Word and the mountains of evidence corroborating the history of Genesis! Please either shop for great educational resources in our Science Department, or make a one-time or monthly donation at rsr.org/donate!RealScienceRadio.com - rsr.org - DinosaurSoftTissue.com - YoungEarth.com

Now you can hear Real Science Radio on your smartphone or iPad with the SoundCloud app!
 
Last edited by a moderator:

gcthomas

New member
* An Oil Field That's About 14,000 or 370 Million Years Old: And the guys chuckle about secular dating of an oil field based on the age of fossils which range, allegedly, from only thousands of years to 370 million years!

Errrr, guys? Did you read the story mentioned here?

It is about recovering fossils from tar pits. The variety of ages simply show that the oil from the oil field has been bubbling up in Venezeula for a looong time. The dates you give are for the ages of the fossils, NOT for the eatimated age of the oil field beneath.

Do none of these silly claims you make from ignorance ever embarrass you? Or is the show a cunning atheist plot to discredit the YEC lunatic fringe?
 

Daedalean's_Sun

New member
-Dinosaur soft-tissue found in 2009.

-RSR predicted in 2014 that we will find dinosaur soft-tissue.


Great prediction! In other news, I predict that WWII will end in 1945. Let me know if my prediction turns out to be true.
 

6days

New member
Errrr, guys? Did you read the story mentioned here?
It is about recovering fossils from tar pits. The variety of ages simply show that the oil from the oil field has been bubbling up in Venezeula for a looong time. The dates you give are for the ages of the fossils, NOT for the eatimated age of the oil field beneath.
Do none of these silly claims you make from ignorance ever embarrass you? Or is the show a cunning atheist plot to discredit the YEC lunatic fringe?
And.....How was the age of the fossils determined??
 

gcthomas

New member
I wonder what the chances are that they will do C14 testing on it? :)

Why would they want to use the varied dating of fossils from a tar pit to date the underlying oil field as was described in the mistaken OP?

No criticism of the OP?
 
Top