wiseman said:
I think you read my post too quickly, yes God can do or be any "thing" but not any "not thing" and this does not violate any logical law of non-contradiction.
Man is a referable object and therefore a "be-able" thing for God
God cannot make a square circle because a square circle is not a referable object; it is a "not thing"
this is like saying can God make or be a blah blah blah blah... It is nonsensical, gibberish...
Once divine magic enters the picture, square circles become commonplace if it's God's will. A square is square by definition. A circle is a circle by definition. A man is a man by definition, and a god is a god by definition. Once we allow God to trump these definitions, then such contradictions become acceptable. Square circles and man-gods present us with the same inherent and definitive contradiction. So the assertion (Clete's and Yorzhiks's) that there is some absolute law that such contradictions can't exist, and that anyone who claims they do exist is unrighteous, contradicts even their own most sacred beliefs. God's divine magic does not changed the fact that they claimed that something they themselves believe in couldn't happen, and that they have essentially called themselves unrighteous by their believing that it did happen.
